The latest telephone scam: 'Hijacked' accounts
Article Abstract:
Slamming, the term used for switching someone's long distance telephone service to another carrier without their knowledge or permission, has become a serious type of telephone scam. Slamming is accomplished by companies that randomly target homes and send to their local Bell company a letter of agency claiming that the target family gave them permission to switch long-distance carriers. The rates for the new service are frequently higher than other carriers. Companies that perform slams frequently target immigrants from Latin America or Asia by sending them contest entries written in Spanish or Chinese, with permission for switching service written in fine print in English. Companies linked to slamming include Sonic Communications, Cherry Communications, Metromedia Communications and Wiltel Inc. The FCC and the states of California, New York, Florida and Georgia have begun developing regulations to stop slamming.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
U.S. faults BellSouth bid on Louisiana long-distance service
Article Abstract:
BellSouth should not receive permission to offer long-distance telephone service in Louisiana because of failure to open its local network for statewide competition, according to a Justice Department recommendation. The FCC is expected to reject BellSouth's application, the fourth filed by a regional Bell company, on Feb 6, 1997. A Telecommunications Act of 1996 provision, meanwhile, directs the agency to give 'substantial weight' to the Justice Department's recommendations. The legislation also requires regional Bells to open their local systems before receiving approval to offer long-distance service within their regions. The Justice Department and FCC have rejected previous and similar applications from SBC Communications and Ameritech. Most telecommunications experts believe the FCC will turn down the third petition, from BellSouth in South Carolina, by Dec 29, 1997.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
F.C.C. blocks two Bells on long-distance entry
Article Abstract:
The FCC rejected attempts by Ameritech and U S West to sell long-distance service, ruling that their marketing arrangements with long-distance Qwest Communications International violated the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Terms of the May 1998 deal would have allowed Ameritech and U S West to collect fees in exchange for signing up their customers for Qwest's long-distance service. The FCC upheld the communications act's prohibition of Bells from selling long distance because of their AT&T legacy and local phone influence. None of the five Bells has convinced the FCC that they have opened their local networks to rival companies in compliance with the communications act. By contrast, the newly-created MCI WorldCom and nearly all other companies have the right to join the long-distance market.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: GOP senators expect to introduce plan for Bells to offer long-distance service. Telecom deregulation spawns rival bills; House committees differ on Justice Agency role in Baby Bells' future
- Abstracts: Deregulation of phones: the hard part: F.C.C. plan gets down to practical questions. Nynex lets rival sell phone service
- Abstracts: Intuit's '96 'Quicken' to offer access to personal-finance site on Internet
- Abstracts: Novell is said to be selling its Unix division to Santa Cruz
- Abstracts: An Internet author of sexually violent fiction faces charges. Pacific Bell, MCI to expand Internet service; other carriers seen following their lead