Financial statement users' perceptions of factors affecting the ability of auditors to resist client pressure in a conflict situation
Article Abstract:
This study investigates the perceived effects of four factors in the likelihood that an auditor will acquiesce to the demands of a client when a dispute arises over a significant financial reporting issue. A repeated measures experiment was conducted using 49 security analysts and 69 bankers as subjects. Analysis of Variance results indicate that an auditor is perceived as being more likely to acquiesce to his client's demands when the accounting issue in dispute is not dealt with clearly by an accounting standard. Auditors also are viewed as being more likely to acquiesce when: (1) competition in the audit environment is aggressive; (2) the audit firm is small; and (3) the audit firm provides management consulting services to its audit client. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Accounting and Finance
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0810-5391
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Decision tree versus decision tables for audit test data design: an experimental study
Article Abstract:
Use of test data is an important evidence collection method that auditors can employ to evaluate the authenticity, accuracy, and completeness of program processing. Nevertheless, test data design is a time-consuming and error-prone process. To facilitate design, two approaches advocated are the decision-tree approach and the decision-table approach. An experiment conducted to examine the quality of test data designs produced using both approaches showed some support for the superiority of the decision-table approach over the decision-tree approach. Insofar as the results obtained are problematical, however, the research needs to be replicated and extended. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Accounting and Finance
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0810-5391
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Use of forward versus backward reasoning during audit analytical procedures: evidence from a computerised-process-tracing field study
Article Abstract:
A study is conducted on the usage of forward and backward reasoning approaches by auditors, during audit analytical procedures.
Publication Name: Accounting and Finance
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0810-5391
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Accounting, controls, change and the perceptions of managers: a longitudinal study of ward units in a teaching hospital
- Abstracts: Merger motives and merger prescriptions. Takeovers in the '60s and the '80s: evidence and implications. Research note and communication mergers that last: A predictable pattern?
- Abstracts: Should human resources be reflected on the balance sheet? Professionals should plan to avoid lawsuits. Applying business methods and techniques: the case of the misaligned merger
- Abstracts: A view from over the brow - 2. Auditor independence in Europe. Canada accounts for pension costs
- Abstracts: The US: what happened then? Futures markets face regulatory backlash. Rights issues: evaluating management performance