Plan sponsors ease social consciences
Article Abstract:
Approximately 300 U.S. corporations continue to do business in South Africa, despite its oppressive regime; however, pension plan investment managers are avoiding investing funds in these corporations. Prior to making an investment decision based upon social conscience, the pension plan manager should (1) ensure that the portfolio's diversification will not suffer from the omission, (2) determine how the omission will affect the portfolio's ability to outperform the market, and (3) analyze transaction costs related to selling a socially unacceptable stock, prior to divestment. According to research performed by U.S. Trust Co. (of Boston), the economic risk for portfolio managers is not significantly changed when the 200 stocks related to South Africa are excluded as investment possibilities.
Publication Name: Cashflow Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0196-6227
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Higher PBGC rates, rule changes won't kill defined benefit plans
Article Abstract:
Premiums paid to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC) by companies sponsoring defined benefit plans are expected to increase more than 300 percent in 1986. Higher PBGC rates may be offset by reducing the number of participants in a plan; alternatively, some companies may switch to a defined contribution plan. Financially sound benefit plans, however, may not be so adversely affected by the proposed PBGC rate increase, if a risk-related premium system is installed. Such a system would require underfunded pension plans to pay a higher annual per-participant premium than would financially sound plans. In addition, proposed changes in plan termination rules may benefit healthy plans.
Publication Name: Cashflow Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0196-6227
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Pension fund managers' fees may be based on performance
Article Abstract:
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has ruled that money managers may charge, in addition to their flat fee, a performance fee based on the increase in the value of the client's portfolio. The SEC does not specify how performance fees should be structured, so the specific formula may be negotiated between the client and the investment manager, including a possible penalty for poor performance. Many states, however, have laws prohibiting performance fee arrangements. Pension plan sponsors should get approval from the U.S. Department of Labor before negotiating performance fees.
Publication Name: Cashflow Magazine
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0196-6227
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Should investors avoid all actively managed mutual funds? A study in Bayesian performance evaluation. Capital gains tax rules, tax-loss trading, and turn-of-the-year returns
- Abstracts: Rx PR firms enjoy healthy gains in fees. Pims files for chapt. 11 bankruptcy
- Abstracts: Japanese sogo shosha and the U.S. export trading companies. Information system innovations and supply chain management: channel relationships and firm performance
- Abstracts: Overcoming resistance to state-of-the-art cash management. Incentive pay spreads to lower corporate levels. Plant acquisition becomes risk management problem
- Abstracts: Too many annual reports offer 'same old garbage,' investment banker says. Treasury managers eye writing software in-house