The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasks
Article Abstract:
The performance of auditors in formulating hypotheses in an analytical review case is examined. The study seeks to determine the influence of the review process on the hypothesis-generation ability of the research participants. Two possible sources of gain from using the review process are proposed, namely the discussion effect and the rank effect. The former involves a comparison between a review group with discussion and a group without discussion, while the latter involves a comparison between senior executives and audit managers. The results show that the review process does improve the ability of auditors to generate plausible hypotheses. Findings also reveal that gain from the review process stems from discussion within the review process between reviewer and reviewee. No significant difference is found in the performance of senior executives and auditors.
Publication Name: Accounting, Organizations and Society
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0361-3682
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors
Article Abstract:
A study was conducted to investigate the role of auditors' information selection and processing in the assessment of the quality of their decisions. One hundred auditors participated in an experiment wherein they given financial profiles for 30 companies and asked to predict whether the profiled companies would go bankrupt and to assess the probability that their predictions were correct. The participants were divided into five groups with different experimental conditions created by crossing information selection and information processing by information load. The findings indicate that information selection serves to limit evaluation of the auditor's predictive accuracy, and that information processing constrained decision-making in the higher information selection.
Publication Name: Accounting, Organizations and Society
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0361-3682
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The errors in the variables problem in the cross-section of expected stock returns. The puzzle in post-listing common stock returns
- Abstracts: The cost of learning's pressure on earnings. Inflation hits education. Hot-line to the dealing floor
- Abstracts: The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups. The contingency theory of corporate reporting: some empirical evidence
- Abstracts: Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment