The strategy-shareholder value relationship: testing temporal stability across market cycles
Article Abstract:
The best technique for protecting stockholder value against economic downturns in business cycles is to diversify investments in a related manner so that they are similar. Investment strategy should specifically consider its market environment when being evaluated, and it is useful to consider the strategies of the companies concerned when examining the relationship of business cycles and the stationarity of the market model coefficients. Companies diversifying by emphasizing common core technology demonstrate a lower level of systematic risk, regardless of the market environment. Diversified investments that are similar earn higher risk-adjusted returns than dissimilar investments during market downturns.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Merger strategies and stockholder value
Article Abstract:
Acquisition research indicates a tie between shareholder gains and how merging companies are related. This idea is tested by grouping mergers into four relatedness categories, and by employing stockholder value measures as developed in the capital markets literature. Stock returns from 439 acquiring companies in 1,031 large mergers are looked at, as are stock returns from 340 big, acquired companies. Findings indicate that mergers result in permanent gains in shareholder value for stockholders in both acquired and acquiring firms. The notion that some product and market relatedness is superior to none is not supported.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1987
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Corporate mergers, stockholder diversification, and changes in systematic risk
Article Abstract:
One hundred twenty large mergers were examined to determine the connection between the relatedness and systematic risk of consolidating firms. The analysis controlled for systematic risk for target firms, monitored risk over monthly and daily time periods, and considered the influence of leverage. Research results reveal clear support for the hypothesis that related mergers will lower the systematic risk of bidding companies. Research results reveal less support for the hypothesis that unrelated mergers will not alter the systematic risk of bidding companies.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1990
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Planned patterns of strategic behavior and their relationship to business-unit performance. The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance
- Abstracts: Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Consensus on strategy formulation and organizational performance: competitors in a fragmented industry
- Abstracts: Many business deductions and credits affected by provisions of Tax Reform Act of 1986. Corporations can use a partnership to increase benefits from R&D expenses
- Abstracts: Fair chance for consumers. Dealing with insolvent partnerships. Consumer protection
- Abstracts: Z-scores: an approach to the recession. Towards a recruitment revolution. Graduate recruitment