function confirmModerate(url,num,pid){ url = url + '?Comments[do]=mod&Comments[pid]=' + pid + '&Comments[id]=' + num + '#Comments_' + num; if (confirm('Do you want to report this comment as inappropriate?')) location.href=url; return 0; } function validate_form(frm) { var value = ''; var errFlag = new Array(); _qfMsg = ''; value = frm.elements['Comments[name]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['name']) { errFlag['name'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your name'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[captcha]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['captcha']) { errFlag['captcha'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter Security Code'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[mail]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your e-mail'; } var regex = /^((\"[^\"\f\n\r\t\v\b]+\")|([\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+(\.[\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+)*))@((\[(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))\])|(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))|((([A-Za-z0-9\-])+\.)+[A-Za-z\-]+))$/; if (value != '' &&!regex.test(value) && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - E-mail address format is invalid'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[text]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your comment'; } if (value.length<50 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too short (50 characters min.)'; } if (value.length>4000 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too long (4000 characters max)'; } if (_qfMsg != '') { _qfMsg = 'Invalid information entered:' + _qfMsg + '\nPlease correct these fields.'; alert(_qfMsg); return false; } return true; } //]]>

Zinfandel's new look

Article Abstract:

Zinfandel is once again popular, and several are rich and lush, rating over 90 on a scale of one to 100. Many good Zinfandels can be purchased for $8 or less, and they are usually best enjoyed without aging. Several vintners are profiled, and a number of wines are rated.

Author: Laube, James

Publisher: Marvin R. Shanken Communications, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wine Spectator
Subject: Food and beverage industries
ISSN: 0193-497X
Year: 1992

Cover Story, Appreciation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Zinfandel: it has never been better

Article Abstract:

California Zinfandel producers Peter Franus, Robert Biale, Robert Lamborn and others are creating excellent Zinfandels. Wines from 1989 to 1992 are rated on a scale of one to 100, with tasting notes provided. Best values are also listed.

Author: Laube, James

Publisher: Marvin R. Shanken Communications, Inc.
Publication Name: The Wine Spectator
Subject: Food and beverage industries
ISSN: 0193-497X
Year: 1993

Management

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Subjects list: Evaluation, Zinfandel (Wine), Vintners

Similar abstracts:

Abstracts: Sonoma's old-vine Zinfandel sites offer unique reds. '78s still ripe and rich. Getting it (too) ripe

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.