"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon
Article Abstract:
The risks associated with pay-for-performance plans are addressed by Barry Gerhart. He agrees with Beer and Cannon's argument that companies already having strong employee relations may have the most to lose in experimenting with the types of pay-for-performance programs they describe.
Publication Name: Human Resource Management
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0090-4848
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon
Article Abstract:
A comment on Michael Beer's and Mark Cannon's 'Promise and Peril in implementing pay-for-performance' by Patrick Dailey is presented. According to him, pay-for-performance (PFP) programs may be unproductive in influencing behavior of employees due to high costs of implementation.
Publication Name: Human Resource Management
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0090-4848
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
"Promise and peril in implementing pay-for-performance" by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon
Article Abstract:
The information provided by Michael Beer and Mark D. Canon is very informative but it is argued that conclusions given are too broad for three reasons. Gerald Ledford mentions some specific conditions faced by Hewlett Packard that explain the abandonment of the new pay programs.
Publication Name: Human Resource Management
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0090-4848
Year: 2004
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic: