COBRA law damages health care system
Article Abstract:
Congress passed the 1986 Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) in part to prevent hospitals from rejecting emergency patients who could not pay, but the law is poorly tailored to address the problem of patient dumping. COBRA and associated regulations make hospitals follow detailed procedures and fill out extensive paperwork in many unnecessary cases, and apply potentially huge penalties for technical infractions. The law conflicts with the need to reduce costs by restricting non-emergency use of emergency rooms; it is clumsy and dangerous, and should be changed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
EMTALA claims need no proof of improper motive; high court says plaintiffs suing hospitals under Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act need no bad-intent proof
Article Abstract:
Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) cases used to have to show evidence that a hospital had an improper motive such as indigence or the patient's race ir sex when it violated the stabilization portion of the act, but after the Supreme Court's 1999 ruling in Roberts v. Galen of Virginia, Inc., evidence of such a motive will no longer be necessary. Hospitals should, however, not delay with necessary stabilizing examinations by asking about the patient's ability to pay for care. Some observers state that EMTALA filings will increase as a result of this ruling.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Unwary hospitals may face the sharp fangs of COBRA; because penalties for violations are severe, hospitals must use caution in transferring or discharging their emergency room patients
Article Abstract:
The Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act includes language, most recently modified July 22, 1994, mandating many hospital procedures in minute detail. Hospitals must tailor their forms and procedures to comply with COBRA and reflect its language, or face draconian reprisals. The act forces hospitals and doctors to become informants regarding even technical violations. Steps to comply with important elements are discussed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Respective scope of the substance over form theory and transfer pricing in a French audit. Arm's length principle, exit tax and commensurate with income standard: some practical thoughts on the new German transfer pricing rule 2008
- Abstracts: Investor-state disputes: the interface between treaty-based international investment protection and fiscal sovereignty
- Abstracts: 'Slam dunk' seen for Microsoft in its antitrust pact appeal; lawyers watching D.C. Circuit arguments put their money on software giant
- Abstracts: The importance of the Bankruptcy Code's protections for aircraft financiers has been underscored by the recent Chapter 11 filing of Pan American Airways
- Abstracts: Poor people skills can collapse firms. Laterals: the profession's blind dates; firms need to get nosier in order to protect themselves