Contingent power resulted in inclusion of property in estate
Article Abstract:
The Tax Court held, in Estate of Kurz, that property over which the decedent had a general power of appointment subject to contingencies was includable in the decedent's estate as long as the contingency did not have significant non-tax consequences. The decedent was allowed to control 5% of a family trust when and if her marital trust was expended. The decedent died with nearly $3.5 million in the marital trust and so did not use the contingency. Though the Tax Court's findings were accurate, the logic of non-tax consequences was based on a faulty interpretation of IRC section 2041.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Stock subject to sale to third party failed to qualify for QTIP treatment
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Federal Claims held in the Estate of Rinaldi that whether an income interest qualifies for qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) treatment is to be determined at the date of election rather than date of death, and the testator's intent must be considered. In Rinaldi, the will creating the potential QTIP trust clearly provided for the possibility that the income interest would terminate, therefore invalidating it for QTIP treatment. Selling the property at issue prior to the election, was additional evidence the IRC section 2056 requirement was not met.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Fourth Circuit confirms that noncharitable gifts by check were complete in year of delivery
Article Abstract:
The Fourth Circuit held in Metzger that noncharitable gifts in the form of checks may be declared for the year in which the check was given to the donee, even if the check clears the bank in the next year. A clear intent on the part of the donor to avoid gift taxes by limiting gifts to $10,000 per donee per year, coupled with the fact that he never wrote more than one $10,000 check-per-donee-per-year, made the court's decision to rely on the relation-back doctrine an easy one. Case history is discussed.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: State court approval results in estate tax exclusion of incompetent's gifts. Making estate planning fun (again?)
- Abstracts: Attempted sale of remainder did not keep property out of estate. A charitable remainder trust can't be a QSST, IRS determines
- Abstracts: Continued prosecution in a continuation application, or a Transco best mode trap for the unwary? Comment: stripping politics from the Board
- Abstracts: Court spending under review; waste seen in U.S. courthouse construction, judicial conferences. Toxic torthouse? Ailing employees sue builders of new courthouse in suburban Chicago
- Abstracts: Final regulations under section 382 clarify taxation of options. Proposed regulations narrow consistency rules on stock and asset acquisitions.