Court again limits majority-minority districts
Article Abstract:
Two US SUpreme Court decisions in 1996 have struck down majority-minority congressional districts in Texas and North Carolina, leaving questions about what role race may play in redistricting. The Court ruled 5-4 in both cases that race was the main factor in creating all four districts at issue, and that they were not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. At least five justices seem to agree, however, that compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can under some circumstances be a compelling interest.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Where to draw the line on race redistricting?
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court will consider in its 1995-96 term questions about race in redistricting left unanswered by its prior decisions in Shaw v Reno and Miller v Johnson. The main issue is determining when race is the predominant factor affecting a new district's shape, rather than one of many factors in a messy political process. States in two cases also contend they had a compelling govt interest in complying with the Voting Rights Act, while foes of the districts say they are insufficiently tailored to the problem.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Montana's lost seat begs issue: House apportioning system challenged
Article Abstract:
Montana is challenging its loss of one seat in the House of Representatives as a result of the 1990 Census. The new apportionment reduces Montana's House seats from two to one, forcing incumbents Ron Marlenee and Pat Williams to run against each other. The case, to be heard by the Supreme Court Mar 4, 1992, is the first legal challenge to Capitol Hill statistical methods of apportionment adopted in 1941.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: CA-5 reverses Tax Court and upholds QTIP despite executor's discretion to make the election. Ninth Circuit upholds QTIP despite trust provision permitting accumulation of income
- Abstracts: Control and restricted securities. Control and restricted securites
- Abstracts: Key libel case goes to trial; ruling on altered quotes is put to test. Libel suit spotlights rap 'hate-speak.' (suit against rap group N.W.A. by television host Denise Barnes)
- Abstracts: Estate may adopt wait-and-see approach and determine amount of QTIP on date of election. QTIP was disallowed because of executors' discretion whether to make the election
- Abstracts: 5th Circuit ruling throws major fly in MCorp ointment. Courts prop up receivers' powers under bailout law. Lawyer after fee throws a wrench in USX arbitration