Disparate impact reference trilogy for statistics
Article Abstract:
Disparate impact for job discrimination is defined statistically using three references. Various federal employee selection guidelines use an 80% rule though allow for discrimination occurring when this rule is met if separate hiring practices have a lower diversity rate. US Supreme Court cases state that individual practices can be discriminatory even when the overall hiring shows no disparate impact. The 1991 Civil Rights Act focuses on specific not overall processes. Discrimination can be determined through a threshold test and a barriers test using binomial statistics or applicant data depending on the findings.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The role of two statistical approaches to EEO cases
Article Abstract:
Employment discrimination cases can be tried with hypergeometric or binomial statistics. As both produce a standard deviation and a probability to determine statistical significance, both can be used in disparate impact analyses. Disparate impact can be analyzed by threshold, by barrier and by selection and these statistical distributions can be useful with all three. After adverse impact is demonstrated, the employer can prove validity, and the plaintiff has a chance to show if there is another practice with less adverse impact that will meet the employer's legitimate needs.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Statistics in corporate downsizing cases: unfulfilled promise for plaintiffs
Article Abstract:
Practical application of lessons found in 38 Federal Circuit Court of Appeals cases dealing with the use of statistics in corporate downsizing employment discrimination cases is possible. Employees use of employers' statistics is often not possible because of the lack of or self-serving statistical record-keeping. Available statistics should be presented in specific ways but cannot be relied upon to satisfy plaintiffs' burdens of persuasion that employers' reasons for disparities are pretextual.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Arbitration improves the justice system. The role of arbitration in the field of patent law. Intellectual property disputes: arbitrating the creative
- Abstracts: The ABC's of EMG. The use of class actions in personal injury cases. Ex parte contacts with plaintiffs' treating physicians
- Abstracts: Gang busters; prosecutors are turning to powerful federal statutes and some handy local ordinances to stop criminal gangs in their tracks
- Abstracts: The private sector in perspective - 1994/95. Threat of surge in pay settlements recedes. The private sector in perspective - 1995/96
- Abstracts: Pay prospects for 1996/97 - a survey of the private sector. Economic outlook for 1996/97. Economic outlook for 1995/96