High court spends snowy session hearing IP cases; a software dispute straddles line between compatibility and innovation. And should patent cases go to jury trials?
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court on Jan 8 considered two intellectual property cases widely thought to have profound implications. Lotus v Borland concerns the limits of copyright protection in the software industry and ultimately the law on developing product compatibility, while Markman v Westview involves the right to a jury trial in patent construction claims. Observers said the justices appeared to seek a merger case intepretation in the Borland case, in which an expression indistinguishable from an idea is not protectable.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Jack Brown is 70 and kicking; IP master says the loss to Microsoft was not his swan song
Article Abstract:
Jack E. Brown of Phoenix, AZ's Brown and Bain is unfazed by his loss as Apple Corp's lawyer in Apple's attempt to have courts declare Microsoft Corp and Hewlett Packard Corp guilty of copyright infringement in their use of Apple's graphical user interface. Brown blames a pre-existing license agreement which contained many of the elements of the court case, and Apple General Counsel Edward B. Stead agrees with him. Brown professes to be discouraged at judicial failure to use copyright law to protect software.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Federal Circuit judged flawed; IP lawyers say court's factionalism breeds inconsistent rulings
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has assumed prominence due to US dependence on technological innovation, but some members of the intellectual property bar accuse the court of unpredictability, listing deep divisions on basic patent doctrine, a historic and continuing bias favoring patent-holders and often panel-dependent results. Alternatives under discussion include expanding the Federal Circuit's intellectual property jurisdiction to include copyright law.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Majority's decision criticized in forceful dissent; Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman attacks 'Markman' for limiting the right to a jury trial
- Abstracts: The Supreme Court goes back to work. Stormy sessions: the court carries on through a blizzard and a budget freeze
- Abstracts: Making family gifts, donations pay: rewards include tax breaks and deductions now, investment growth later. Protect assets before lawsuit arises: financial planning can help preserve profits, dissuade claimants
- Abstracts: The other victims. Corporate temptations; serving on a client's board holds risks as well as benefits. Trial over, Simpson analyst re-evaluates: educating the public is noble, but how commentators do it needs scrutiny
- Abstracts: The Official Gazette and willful patent infringement: Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc. The application of experimental use to design patents: a square peg in a round hole