Hurdle cleared for tobacco suit; with class action OK, plaintiffs' lawyers promise massive effort, cooperation
Article Abstract:
A disparate group of lawyers has banded together for what may be the biggest lawsuit ever, a class action against 16 tobacco companies and on behalf of addicted smokers. Led by Wendell Gauthier, 59 law firms have formed the Castano Tobacco Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, assembled a legal team and initiated a huge discovery of relevant documents. Managing those documents and the lawyers' own egos will be the great challenge for the plaintiffs. If the case succeeds it will probably break the tobacco makers' power, while if it fails, it will probably have no successor.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Litigants talk tobacco; immunity among issues that could hinder settlement
Article Abstract:
Losses in suits have spurred the tobacco industry to put aside its tactics of conceding nothing and of fighting all suits and to start settlement negotiations. Initial proposals were payments of $300 bil from cigarette companies for smoking-related illnesses. These payments would be stretched over the next 25 years. About two-thirds would be to states to reimburse Medicaid care and the rest would be individual reimbursement for smoking-related illnesses. In return, the industry would receive near-complete immunity from smokers' current and future suits.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A Texas turnaround; fear of disclosures and sky-high verdicts may be prompting Big Tobacco's rush to settle
Article Abstract:
Texas was the sixth of 41 states that sued the tobacco companies for reimbursement of money spend treating smoking-related illnesses and that state also charged the industry with unfair, deceptive trade practices and racketeering. Initially, tobacco lawyers were eager to fight the Texas industry case. Independent legal experts feel Texas' turnaround from its inital posture never to settle the suit was caused mainly by the tobacco industry's fear of negative disclosures. It was not a good time to risk these with the national settlement before Congress.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A chink (or two) in the bill of lading plaintiff's jurisdictional armour? Good news for Australian maritime arbitration?
- Abstracts: Business is booming: law firms profiting from good economy, efficient operation. Post-law school job may be as paralegal: trend more pronounced on East and West coasts where work tough to find
- Abstracts: Building a reputation: simple, sincere marketing efforts may reap the biggest rewards. On location: finding the right community for a practice can be a profitable move
- Abstracts: 'Castano' to 5th Circuit: a gamble? Judge in tobacco class case allows interlocutory appeal. 5th Circuit next for tobacco suit
- Abstracts: Draw the fire away from the witness. A giant-killer should limit scope of attack