Implications of the Superleague case
Article Abstract:
The Australian Full Federal Court's decision in News Ltd. v. New South Wales Rugby League may have implications for other sports leagues or other businesses that enter into joint ventures. The Court found that two rugby leagues had violated the Trade Practices Act by using their market positions to boycott News Ltd. The Court also suggested that contracts with the rugby players were contracts for services, covered by the Trade Practices Act. Despite the ruling, joint ventures formed for purposes other than excluding particular persons or groups will probably comply with the Act.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Securing the rights of minority shareholders: the courts can do it without the need for statutory change
Article Abstract:
Resolutions of issues of shareholders' rights and the use of the business judgment rule in Australian company law should be sought in the the High Court rather than the Parliament. The New South Wales Supreme Court, in Mesenberg v. Cord Industrial Recruiters Pty., narrowly interpreted section 1324 of the Corporations Law, allowing only the Australian Securities Commission to seek a section 232 injunction. The Federal Court, in Air Peak Pty. v. Jetstream Aircraft Ltd., interpreted section 1324 more broadly. This conflict should be resolved by the courts not Parliament.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Editorial
Article Abstract:
Recent developments in Australian business law include the introduction of labor law changes, inactivity in corporate law reforms and case law focusing on tax planning and aboriginal rights. Proposed federal legislation would bring back secondary boycott laws and revise employee dismissal and collective bargaining laws. Debate surrounds the tax avoidance decision in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Spotless Services and the aboriginal land rights case, The Wik Peoples v. State of Queensland.
Publication Name: Australian Business Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0310-1053
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Athletes around the world are challenging the legality of strict liability drug rules that penalize those testing positive for drugs irrespective of culpability
- Abstracts: Ombudspersons and the limits of the general counsel's authority under the National Labor Relations Act: an open letter to Fred Feinstein
- Abstracts: Interested director transactions and the (equivocal) effects of shareholder ratification. Nonprofit corporations: conversion to for-profit corporate status and nonprofit corporation members' rights
- Abstracts: Getting the gnomes of Zurich to cough up; lawyers pursuing Holocaust wealth face huge evidentiary obstacles, but they're unfazed
- Abstracts: Immunity Act leaves spouses unsupported; U.N. workers, others dodge court orders. 'Deadbeat dads' get a boost; ruling hobbles government's ability to collect from them