Judging lives
Article Abstract:
Criticisms levied at judicial biography that focus on the verifiability of truths derived from such writings are unjustified, but the problem of inconsequence in biography deserves consideration. Certain scientific or essentialist biographies that seek some truth about events or the subject's inner self should not be dismissed because the conclusion cannot be verified with certainty. Biographies that provide no convincing link between a jurist's life and his work are subject to attack for being inconsequential, but such charges may fail to consider the subjective and political aspects of judging.
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Commentary
Article Abstract:
Judicial biographies provide scholars and the public with an alternative to abstract and theoretical studies, and judicial biographies, in particular, can offer an alternative to the generalizations of legal theory. Scientific judicial biographies attempt to blend understanding of the judicial process and the development of the law with the lives of those that influence the law. Well-written biographies have merit because of the challenges that biographers face in attempting to develop an engaging narrative that also makes contributions to legal scholarship.
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Unrepeatable lessons
Article Abstract:
Judicial biographies have the potential to serve as windows into the personality differences that lead to different approaches to judging, as well as providing insight into exemplary lives. Biography is satisfying in part because of the human interest in the lives of others. Judicial biography can contribute to a better understanding of why certain judges are activist, restrained or moderate. Expositions of the experiences and temperament of particular judges can be applied to analysis of their practices on the bench.
Publication Name: New York University Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0028-7881
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Expanding files. On command. PowerBook's new addition
- Abstracts: Splashy verdicts. Remote control
- Abstracts: Juggling paper with Acrobat. Wireless insecurity. Digital or bust
- Abstracts: Slamming spam: unclogging law firm e-mail inboxes. IM security. Document retention policies
- Abstracts: U.K. House of Lords rules compound interest applies to ACT compensation claims. Tax treaties and the internal market in the new European scenario