Repeating Nuremberg; planning for war crimes trials forges ahead, but does it matter?
Article Abstract:
The ABA House of Delegates has announced support for a international tribunal to assess liability for alleged war crimes during the Balkan conflict. Such a tribunal was authorized by the UN Security Council in May 1993. Some observers feel this tribunal would be an empty gesture and that the UN has no place imposing punishment for the Balkan conflict when the body has not intervened to try to stop it. Monroe Leigh, who heads the International Law Section's Task Force on War Crimes in the Former Yugoslavia, holds it significant that the UN has supported a war crimes tribunal for the first time since World War II's Nuremberg Trials.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Remembering Nuremberg; a lawyer looks back on a trial that changed law and war
Article Abstract:
Telford Taylor, a key figure in the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials following the Second World War, feels these proceedings enshrined starting aggressive war as a criminal offense under international law. He admits that this raises ex post facto concerns, since aggressive war was not denominated a crime until after World War II. He recalls that Albert Speer was the only figure to obtain a more lenient sentence since he expressed remorse for his acts and tried to prevent some of Hitler's policies. He also recalls the logistical difficulties of the trials.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The world cries for justice
Article Abstract:
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and a similar court to prosecute atrocities in Rwanda may, proponents hope, be a precursor to an international criminal court. The United Nations International Law Commission produced a draft law incorporating such a court in 1994 and Pres Bill Clinton has endorsed the idea. There has been debate over such matters as whether the court would have exclusive jurisdiction and whether it would have jurisdiction over such crimes as terrorism, hijacking and drug trafficking.
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Key libel case goes to trial; ruling on altered quotes is put to test. Libel suit spotlights rap 'hate-speak.' (suit against rap group N.W.A. by television host Denise Barnes)
- Abstracts: New view at Interior; planting seeds of consensus, Bruce Babbitt is still a fighter. A lame duck EPA issues compromise rules, proposals
- Abstracts: Derivatives continue to present tax-planning opportunities for cross-border investments. NPCs and contingent debt instruments have the same economics, but different rules
- Abstracts: Finding the right script: trial lawyers must fit their cases to the belief patterns of juries. Highlighting; putting the right emphasis on the proof in the case
- Abstracts: Rule 11 reforms are criticized; group urges rejection. Rules changes go to Congress; on sanctions, discovery. New disclosure rules attacked; at first hearing on Hill