SEC, Congress clarify securities disclosure issues; the recent reform act and new SEC proposals will help simplify some reporting requirements
Article Abstract:
Sec 102 of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, related Securities and Exchange Commission proposals, and the recommendations of the Task Force on Simplified Disclosure all affect corporate securities disclosure. The 1995 Act seeks to expand and ensure the utility of existing safe harbor provisions for forward-looking business statements. The task force's March 1996 announcement called for eliminating 45 rules and 4 forms, and would affect 23% of the SEC's rules and 54% of its forms and schedules.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Will 'plain English' expose issuers to liability risks; companies concerns about the SEC's proposal to minimize 'legalese' may be addressed by a safe harbor rule
Article Abstract:
Proposals requiring the securities industry to use plain English in prospectuses and disclosure documents could backfire. Underwriters and issuers could become vulnerable to liability claims in the absence of traditional legalese. Plain English could become another form of legal jargon, undermining the goal of providing clearer disclosure. The standards for plain English and its use throughout a securities document remain unclear, so some type of safe harbor rule may be needed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Alert compliance programs avert insider trading; the compliance officer should monitor trading by individuals with access to sensitive data
Article Abstract:
Insider trading, punishable by heavy fines and criminal penalties, can be avoided through proper compliance monitoring procedures. Corporate secretaries can act as compliance officers empowered to monitor employee stock transactions and trades. Trading window periods and restrictions are often used to prevent employee insider trading. A number of insider trading cases are discussed, particularly with regards to the area of tippee liability.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Security provider or security consumer? The European Union and conflict management
- Abstracts: Law firm security can exist beyond the network; document protection programs offer attorneys various ways to improve their confidence
- Abstracts: Can low market value of debt securities render a corporation solvent for preference purposes? A surprising decision from Delaware
- Abstracts: Single VEBA may consist of several separate welfare benefit funds maintained pursuant to collective bargaining agreements
- Abstracts: Full-time do-gooders a rarity but on the rise; only 11 firms employ full-time pro bono counsel, but such work should increase as firms respond to Legal Services cuts