Supreme Court holds legal and investment banking fees of target of friendly takeover nondeductible
Article Abstract:
The Supreme Court ruled in the 1992 case of Indopco v Commissioner that the investment banking fees paid by a firm during the friendly takeover of another firm are not deductible. This case concerned Unilever U.S. Inc's 1978 acquisition of National Starch and Chemical Corp, now called Indopco Inc. Unilever based its contention that the fees were deductible on the Court's 1971 ruling in Lincoln Savings & Loan Assn v Commissioner. However, Justice Harry Blackmun put forward a narrow view of the 1971 ruling that will inhibit taxpayers from claiming a deduction when no separate asset can be proven.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Spin-off of newly formed subsidiary results in recapture of ITC
Article Abstract:
The Tax Court ruled in Salomon, Inc v United States that the IRS can revoke the investment tax credit (ITC) when a parent corporation splits into two corporations through a gradual process accompanied by the transference of property. The Court sided with the IRS in deciding that the incorporation and spin-off Engelhard Minerals and Chemical Corp in 1981 did not meet the criteria for retention of the ITC such as involving property kept as such in the same business.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Tax Court finds anticipatory assignment of income on charitable contribution made "too late" during plan for cash tender offer and downstream merger
Article Abstract:
A 1997 Tax Court decision illustrates the importance of proper tax planning for businesses who claim anticipatory assignment of income related to a charitable contribution. In this instance, a merger agreement was signed several weeks prior to making the gift, this undermining the taxpayers' position. These facts ultimately led to the Court finding the taxpayers liable for deficiencies and penalties.
Publication Name: Journal of Corporate Taxation
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-0593
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Separating powers; courts weigh in on rewriting of Lampf statute-of-limitations scheme. Specialization in Soviet practice; it's still a risky business, but more U.S. firms are entering the fray
- Abstracts: Lawyers have not had a general duty to protect third parties from the bad acts of a client. An increasing number of federal courts have ADR procedures
- Abstracts: One more legacy of Rodney King; U.S. Supreme Court ruling affirms trial court discretion in sentencing. Back to the commerce clause: the Supreme Court has yet to reveal the true significance of Lopez
- Abstracts: 401(k) wraparound arrangements. "Censure-plus" for sponsors of disqualified retirement plans. Courts disagree on whether the contribution of non-cash property to a retirement plan is a prohibited transaction
- Abstracts: Recent changes in the tax laws affecting multinational corporations in certain trading partners of the United States