The case for
Article Abstract:
The Fair Franchising Standards established by the American Association of Franchisees and Dealers will provide both franchisees and franchisors with a starting point for collectively negotiating franchise agreements. Franchise agreements have historically been written by franchisors and have failed to adequately integrate the interests of franchisees. By establishing fair standards and encouraging franchisors to negotiate with franchisees on a collective basis, instead of doing so individually, a level playing field can be developed that will benefit franchisees, franchisors and consumers.
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The case against
Article Abstract:
Franchisees should have the opportunity to correct harsh provisions in franchise agreements, but asking franchisors to impose on themselves an obligation to bargain collectively with franchisees is contrary to business realities. The American Association of Franchisees and Dealers' Fair Franchising Standards go too far by asking franchisors to relinquish all bargaining strength. The standards mistakenly assume that different franchisees will not have conflicting interests. They also fail to address how franchisors can be assured that they are dealing with a representative collective unit.
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Drafting exclusive territory provisions in franchise agreements
Article Abstract:
Many franchisees wish to include clauses in franchise agreements that provide for exclusive territory, and franchisors should draft such clauses to ensure that future business opportunities are not impeded needlessly. It is better to employ a uniform radius clause because more-detailed metes and bounds clauses open up territorial issues to complex negotiations. The clause should account for geographical restrictions, co-branded franchises and franchises in airports, malls and arenas that are unlikely to compete with the franchisee's location.
Publication Name: Franchise Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 8756-7962
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The lease option. PATRIOT Act
- Abstracts: The flexible irrevocable trust. The family bank
- Abstracts: The Yugoslav Tribunal: use of unnamed witnesses against accused. Witness anonymity is inconsistent with due process
- Abstracts: Lotus Notes: present and future. The life cycle of operating systems. Litigation document management grows up
- Abstracts: Set sail for higher returns; foreign investments offer chance to diversify and reap greater dividends. Uncertainty has its own rewards; emerging markets may be the wave of the future for adventurous investors