function confirmModerate(url,num,pid){ url = url + '?Comments[do]=mod&Comments[pid]=' + pid + '&Comments[id]=' + num + '#Comments_' + num; if (confirm('Do you want to report this comment as inappropriate?')) location.href=url; return 0; } function validate_form(frm) { var value = ''; var errFlag = new Array(); _qfMsg = ''; value = frm.elements['Comments[name]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['name']) { errFlag['name'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your name'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[captcha]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['captcha']) { errFlag['captcha'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter Security Code'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[mail]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your e-mail'; } var regex = /^((\"[^\"\f\n\r\t\v\b]+\")|([\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+(\.[\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+)*))@((\[(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))\])|(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))|((([A-Za-z0-9\-])+\.)+[A-Za-z\-]+))$/; if (value != '' &&!regex.test(value) && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - E-mail address format is invalid'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[text]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your comment'; } if (value.length<50 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too short (50 characters min.)'; } if (value.length>4000 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too long (4000 characters max)'; } if (_qfMsg != '') { _qfMsg = 'Invalid information entered:' + _qfMsg + '\nPlease correct these fields.'; alert(_qfMsg); return false; } return true; } //]]>

The cycles of statutory interpretation

Article Abstract:

The author examines the tendency of the US Supreme Court to oscillate over a range of positions on major questions of statutory interpretation over time. Two principle types of cycling mechanisms, litigation mechanisms and legislative-process mechanisms, are examined and a cycling model is proposed.

Author: Vermeule, Adrian

Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001

Models, Interpretation and construction, Law, Practice, Judicial process, United States. Supreme Court

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Norms, empiricism, and canons in statutory interpretation

Article Abstract:

The author argues that although methods of statutory interpretation should be subjected to empirical analysis to determine their value in furthering uniformity and consistency in law, such testing may be problematic because analytic approaches are subject to technical and normative pitfalls.

Author: Eskridge, William N., Jr.

Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1999

Analysis, Legal formalism

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Subjects list: United States

Similar abstracts:

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.