The perils of CEO depositions; avoidance, limitation and, finally, preparation are warranted when discovery embroils the boss
Article Abstract:
Outside counsel for CEOs should, when faced with a request to depose their clients, first learn the purpose of the deposition and perhaps offer more appropriate witnesses instead of the CEO. If this is inappropriate, counsel can seek a protective order or motion to quash under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) or 26(b)(2). Other tactics include motions to delay or limit a deposition. If all else fails, CEOs must be thoroughly prepared for discovery and trial.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Litigation; looking at Rule 30
Article Abstract:
The pros and cons of a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition are discussed, and notice of such a deposition describes with reasonable detail the matters on which examination may take place. Use of this device should be limited by amending the rule or enacting local rules.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Courts tend to limit depositions of high-level execs; if person has no unique knowledge, plaintiffs must use other means
Article Abstract:
Case law regarding depositions of corporate executives is discussed. Detailed affidavits can avoid depositions for executives with no particular knowledge of the facts at issue, others can show that they have no unique knowledge of such facts.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: In-house probes reveal liabilities; counsel should ensure that all privileges are preserved when conducting investigations
- Abstracts: The perils of parallel proceedings: is an arbitration award enforceable if the same case is pending elsewhere?
- Abstracts: The susceptibility of vertical restraints to summary adjudication: procedural avenues to substantive objectives
- Abstracts: Police protection; some courts say officers can assert immunity for shootings that are an excessive use of force
- Abstracts: The irrational application of rational basis: Kimel, Garrett, and congressional power to abrogate state sovereign immunity