The politics of antitrust: President Clinton's bridge to the 21st century's new robber barons
Article Abstract:
President Clinton's antitrust policy has been so weak that it has allowed a new generation of so-called robber barons to prosper and create monopolies. Reagan's and Bush's FTC and Justice Dept appointees could reasonably have been expected to protect the richest economic class, but Anne Bingaman and Robert Pitofsky, both appointed by Clinton, have failed to enforce the laws. Pitofsky appears to support mergers as economically efficient and good for the economy. By accepting Republican-based pro-monopoly policies, the Clinton appointees are allowing monopolies to grow unchecked.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Antitrust without democracy? From competition, to prosperity, and lastly to political freedom?
Article Abstract:
Centralized enforcement of a free market economy or 'economic democracy' is a necessary antecedent to political democracy in poor non-industrialized countries. Poor countries are likely to benefit more from antimonopoly measures than wealthier industrialized countries and such measures would probably be more successful in poorer autocratically controlled countries than in political democracies. What the economies of Zaire, Russia, and China look like in the decades following the 1990s may clarify these issues.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
An antitrust agenda for President Clinton: demote 'theory' and restore the private cases
Article Abstract:
The antitrust and health care policies to be enacted by the Clinton administration would benefit from a greater understanding of efficient markets and the merits of competition. Reforms needed at the FTC and the Antitrust Division include removing the economic theorists who have justified antitrust enforcement inactivity over the past twelve years. These theorists have encourged private suits, publicly supported antitrust enforcement and scrutinized the judiciary's reticence to enforce antitrust laws.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law and Economics Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6048
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Despite it all, rates rose at many firms; most were set early in 2001, before the real downturn of the economy; next year's increases are likely to be more modest
- Abstracts: Seven skill sets required by the 21st Century life insurance specialist. Life (insurance) after estate tax 'repeal' or 'reform'
- Abstracts: That 'other' antitrust trial; FTC's case against Intel is no 'U.S. v. Microsoft.'. Lessons of spin at the Visa trial; one defendant sticks to the law, the other to the bogeyman
- Abstracts: Airline antitrust pact hits a snag; protest over legal fees. Ad notice for class approved
- Abstracts: Fees paid by trust for investment advice not subject to 2% floor on deductions, rules CA-6