When does private discrimination justify public affirmative action?
Article Abstract:
The government could remedy private discrimination in a fashion consistent with the US Supreme Court's anti-affirmative action holding in City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. if attention is given to the broader and more liberal language used by the Court. Consistent and limited remedying of private discrimination, which does not unreasonably burden third parties, is possible using the Court's language as a constitutional underpinning. The context of government procurement can be used to test a model consisting of three justifications for government remedying of private discrimination, which justifications include causation, but-for, and single-market.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A critique of noncommercial justifications for Sherman Act violations
Article Abstract:
Nonprofit organizations should not be able to avoid liability for relatively clear antitrust violations of the Sherman Act on the ground that the violation was not related to the economic effects of the contract, but rather to noncommercial, social welfare justifications. The federal courts should reject the "noncommercial justification" defense and instead make their economic analysis as to the Act's applicability by balancing the value of competition in a given market against non-commercial or non-economic considerations.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Two views of the river: a critique of the liberal defense of affirmative action
Article Abstract:
The author argues that the traditional defense of affirmative action in university admissions fails to challenge the way in which standards of merit perpetuate race and class privilege. An alternative defense of affirmative action based on the need to remedy past and present discrimination is presented.
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: No special protection for women. Supreme Court didn't kill affirmative action. 3d Circuit eases obstacles to reverse bias lawsuits; the court invalidated an affirmative action plan in one decision and lowered the standard for a prima facie case in another
- Abstracts: Private parties, public functions and the new administrative law. Public purpose and private service: the twentieth century culture of contracting out and the evolving law if diffused sovereignty
- Abstracts: The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and fear of foreign prosecution. In through the out door? Retaining judicial review for deported lawful permanent resident aliens
- Abstracts: The use of open terms in contract. The great transformation of regulated industries law