Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

How the new OS/2 and Windows stack up

Article Abstract:

IBM Corp's OS/2 2.0 operating system and Microsoft Corp's Windows 3.0 graphical user interface software each have strengths and weaknesses that show up in a comparison. OS/2's look is superior to Windows' achieving a graphical user interface nearly as attractive as the Apple Macintosh. OS/2 does not run Windows software as well as Windows itself does. In multitasking jobs, OS/2 demands more from the user in developing applications, but the results are superior in performance. Windows' multitasking technique, called cooperating multitasking, also lets users run more than one program at a time. The major benefit OS/2 provides is the ability to run several applications in different windows at one time, including DOS. Windows is a 16-bit operating system, while OS/2 takes advantage of 32-bit processing capabilities of faster computers. Windows has far more applications written for it than OS/2, but many OS/2 programs are currently being written. Each system benefits from a fast microprocessor, and if the user can provide the power, OS/2 is a viable investment. Ultimately, OS/2 is the more user friendly of the two.

Author: Lewis, Peter H.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1992
Computer peripheral equipment, not elsewhere classified, Usage, Product information, Operating systems (Software), Operating systems, Column, GUI, Graphical user interfaces, Graphical user interface, Multitasking (Computing), Operating System, Comparison, Multitasking, Hardware Selection, User-Friendliness, Microsoft Windows 3.0 (GUI), OS/2 2.0 (Operating system)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


I.B.M. and Microsoft revise software pact

Article Abstract:

IBM and Microsoft redefine the way they will work together to develop software for microcomputers. The companies want to dispel rumors that the relationship between them is strained. They reaffirm their partnership, but the arrangement is somewhat changed: rather than developing software together, the companies will divide the work, with IBM having responsibility for some products and Microsoft for others. The companies also say that IBM will license Microsoft's Windows product, which could mean that IBM is preparing to sell Windows, a graphical user interface unlike any of IBM's current products, with its microcomputers. Such a development would be very favorable for Microsoft. The relationship between the companies had reportedly been strained because of differences over strategies and marketing of the OS/2 operating system.

Author: Pollack, Andrew
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1990
Computer software industry, Software industry, Contracts, Product development, Licensing, Marketing Strategy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Microsoft Corp., International Business Machines Corp., IBM, MSFT
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Upgrading Windows software. The latest Microsoft venture? Accounting software
  • Abstracts: Army computer expert joins research group. Microsoft president comes from Boeing. President of Microsoft plans June retirement
  • Abstracts: I.B.M. asks an archrival for advice; Microsoft's chairman offers some cures. Software offers solid future
  • Abstracts: Equipment drags on A.T.&T.; the phone giant's manufacturing woes cause dismay on Wall Street. part 2 'Baby Bell' expansion is backed; Senate panel clears equipment sale bill
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.