Conflict aversion: preference for ambiguity vs conflict in sources and evidence
Article Abstract:
Source conflict and ambiguity are two vital factors which determine the preference of individuals when responding to certain messages. Results derived from an analysis involving 40 psychology students suggest that individuals tend to prefer ambiguous sources with the same message content over conflicting messages from two equally reliable sources. Although the existence of framing effects in source credibility judgements was not established, it was shown that conflicting sources may be perceived as less credible than ambiguous sources.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis
Article Abstract:
Decision-makers divide uncertainty into three types: undifferentiated alternatives, incomplete information and inadequate understanding. The strategies that decision-makers apply for various uncertainty types in naturalistic environments include reduction, assumption-based reasoning, weighing pros and cons, suppression and hedging. Weighing pros and cons manage conflicts between various options, while assumption-based reasoning handles incomplete information. Reduction primarily manages inadequate understanding.
Publication Name: Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes
Subject: Psychology and mental health
ISSN: 0749-5978
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Expectations and preferences for sequences of health and money. The combined effects of risk and time on choice
- Abstracts: Training and transfer-of-learning effects in disabled and normal readers: evidence of specific deficits. Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders
- Abstracts: The effect of outcome information on the evaluation and recall of individuals' own decisions. "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak": beyond mind-body interactions in human decision-making