Cleaning hazardous waste sites
Article Abstract:
While very few hazardous waste sites in the United States have been completely cleaned up, cleaning activities are expected to increase. Trained scientists and engineers will be needed to plan and direct the massive project. The entire cleanup process is expected to take 30 years and cost $500 billion; funding will be split equally by the government and private parties who dumped the wastes. The most expensive sites to clean will be abandoned sites, which come under the Superfund program. Government and privately owned dump sites will be costly as well. Where ground water is contaminated, 20 to 40 years of treatment may be necessary. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has performed poorly so far in its mission as the primary government agency involved with hazardous waste cleanup. Over 31,000 inactive toxic waste dumps have been located since 1980, and while some have been put on a priority list, only 43 sites have been completely cleaned up. The delay from site identification to the beginning of cleanup has averaged seven to nine years. The EPA's shortcomings are apparently due to lack of money and technical personnel. Plans are underway to supplement EPA funding with private monies and to increase staffing. The Department of Energy, responsible for 3,700 sites, is expected to launch an energetic, creative program. But the work that lies ahead is staggering, as demonstrated by certain sites that absorbed pollutants to depths measured in miles over a period of 40 years.
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Flaws in risk assessment
Article Abstract:
EPA protocols for chemical risk assessment studies of laboratory animals have been criticized for breeding and feeding practices. Steadily increasing body weight and tumor incidence in control groups of rats and mice due to genetic drift and overfeeding compromises the value of test results.
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Low-level radioactive waste
Article Abstract:
Opponents have delayed the construction of a low-level radioactive waste disposal site in California's Ward Valley by using data from the unofficial 'Wilshire report.' The safety of the project is well documented in other reports. It should be built without further delay.
Publication Name: Science
Subject: Science and technology
ISSN: 0036-8075
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Taking apart the bomb. Little dish TV. Private eyes
- Abstracts: Turning phone lines into TV lines. Space calls. Imagining space war
- Abstracts: Meta-virus; breaking the hardware species barrier. Cracking the U.S. code. Symmetry breaking
- Abstracts: Sorting out cellphones. Connecting China. High finance, down and dirty
- Abstracts: New hope for vaccine against schistosomiasis. A perspective on AIDS vaccines. Hope for AIDS vaccines