The factor structure of union commitment: an application of confirmatory factor analysis
Article Abstract:
Gordon, Philpot, Burt, Thompson, and Spiller (1980) developed a Union Commitment scale and identified four underlying factors. Friedman and Harvey (1986), in a reanalysis of the Gordon et al. data, concluded that union commitment was best represented by two factors. Although several investigations have replicated the Gordon et al. factor structure, none of these have used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In the present study, we used CFA to test the explanatory power of the two a priori factor structures. A sample of 465 blue-collar workers working for a large utility company in the midwestern United States participated in this investigation. The results suggest that, first, a modified version of Gordon et al.'s four-factor solution provides a better representation of the factor structure of union commitment. Second, the use of either the four-factor solution or commitment as a unidimensional construct may be justified, depending on the research focus. Finally, we found that unit weighting of the union commitment items was the most appropriate strategy for generating composites. The implication of these results and suggestions for future research are discussed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support
Article Abstract:
Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchinson, and Sowa (1986) recently conducted a study focused on a measure of perceived employer commitment that they called the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS). In the present study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the dimensionality of the SPOS and to determine the distinctiveness of this construct from other similar constructs. Participants were 330 employees in a large corporation headquartered in the southeastern United States. The results support the SPOS as a unidimensional scale that is distinguishable from affective and continuance commitment. However, the data raise some questions as to the empirical distinction between the SPOS and satisfaction. (Reprinted by permission of publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1991
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Evidence for the stability of the four dimensions of the commitment of the union scale
Article Abstract:
Responses to 29 of the original 48 items of the Commitment to the Union Scale (Gordon, Philpot, Burt, Thompson, & Spiller, 1980) were obtained from 208 unionized employees at two points in time. Confirmatory factor analysis found support for the four factors of Union Loyalty, Responsibility to the Union, Willingness to Work for the Union, and Belief in Unionism. Furthermore, it was found that these four factors were stable and reliable over an 8-month time period. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Applied Psychology
Subject: Social sciences
ISSN: 0021-9010
Year: 1989
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis. Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity
- Abstracts: Refinements in validity generalization methods: implications for the situational specificity hypothesis. Problems and pitfalls in using capital budgeting and financial accounting techniques in assessing the utility of personnel programs
- Abstracts: Validity generalization in the context of situational models. A note on validity generalization procedures
- Abstracts: Ideology and referral categories in employee assistance program research. Drinking behavior and risk factors related to the work place: implications for research and prevention
- Abstracts: Job satisfaction: environmental and genetic components. Work values: genetic and environmental influences. Genetic influences on job satisfaction: a reply to Cropanzano and James