A new tack is taken by Microsoft; it cites weaknesses in Sun's Java product
Article Abstract:
Microsoft's attorneys, during cross-examination of Sun Microsystems Executive James A. Gosling, attempted to demonstrate that its software rival planned anticompetitive tactics. Gosling's testimony on Dec 3, 1998, is part of the antitrust lawsuit filed in Federal court against Microsoft by the Government and 20 states. Tom Burt, a lawyer representing Microsoft, asked Gosling to discuss Sun executives' 1996 E-mail messages that referred to meetings between Sun and Netscape. Sun at that time was creating a Java-based Web browser software product, Hot Java, while Netscape led the browser market. Gosling acknowledged that companies discuss evolving technologies, but did not recall plans to discontinue Hot Java after meeting with Netscape. Hot Java did not reach the market because Sun believed it could not be profitable given Microsoft's free Internet Explorer browser, according to Gosling.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Microsoft rests its case, ending on a misstep
Article Abstract:
The Microsoft Corp. rested its case in government's antitrust trial after over five months of testimony, and six weeks after the government completed its case. The government has tried to prove that Microsoft intimidated industry competitors and tried to gain competitive advantages with its monopolization of computer operating systems. Robert Muglia, a Microsoft senior vice president, was the final witness and he testified about his company's relationship with Sun Microsystems, the creator and owner of the Java programming language. The government's lead trial lawyer, David Boies, once again was able to trip up a Microsoft witness, getting Mr. Muglia to apparently contradict himself and finally cause the presiding judge to order the witness to stop talking. The case will reconvene in mid-April for several weeks of rebuttal testimony.
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A Microsoft rebuttal but nothing to rebut. Apple executive testifies of threats and bullying by Microsoft
- Abstracts: Miller and Visa join the ranks of edgy marketers that like to re-examine their agency roster. Mastercard joins the growing crowd that believes what sells here will sell there, too
- Abstracts: New campaign by Wendy's seeks young dudes with attitudes to munch a bunch of burgers. An explosion of account activity on Madison Ave., even though it was a four-day week
- Abstracts: Johnson & Johnson could face delay in bringing Benecol products to market