The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework
Article Abstract:
Argument regarding power and politics providing the social energy that transforms the insights of individuals and groups into the institutions of an organization is presented. It is also proposed that different forms of power in organizations are connected to specific learning processes, such as intuition is linked with discipline, interpretation with influence, integration with force, and institutionalization with domination.
Publication Name: Academy of Management Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0363-7425
Year: 2005
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The underlying structure of continuous change
Article Abstract:
Organizational change and conventional and new approaches to continuous change management are discussed.
Publication Name: MIT Sloan Management Review
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 1532-9194
Year: 2006
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Orchestral manoeuvres in the dark: understanding failure in organizational strategizing
Article Abstract:
The inability of a symphony orchestra to develop an artistic strategy is examined.
Publication Name: Journal of Management Studies
Subject: Business, general
ISSN: 0022-2380
Year: 2003
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The effect of concept formulation on concept test scores. Organizational learning and new product introductions
- Abstracts: The keys to motivation generation. Women's business. Take-off
- Abstracts: Within and beyond communities of practice: making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice
- Abstracts: Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. Global network configuration for innovation: a study of international fibre innovation
- Abstracts: The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Institutional theory, language and discourse analysis: A comment on Phillips, Lawrence, and Hardy