Don't get hurt by high-income bonds
Article Abstract:
Investors in guaranteed-income bonds in 1990 have protected their capital and seen high income levels, but investors in high-income bonds have seen their capital eroded. Guaranteed income bonds (Gibs) guarantee both income and capital, while high-income bonds do not guarantee capital. Interest rates look set to rise in 1996 which is thus not a good time to buy Gibs. Guaranteed equity bonds (Gebs) guarantee a specific return for a set periodand returns are aggregated so this type of product does not provide a regular income.
Publication Name: Investors Chronicle
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0261-3115
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
On the trail of traditional options
Article Abstract:
Traditional options are not as well known as traded options, and are traded on the Traditional Options Market in London, England, rather than the London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (Liffe). Liffe options offer more flexibility in terms of when they can be exercised. Holders of traded options do not receive dividends, but holders of traditional options do receive payments in cash equivalent to net dividends. Not all brokers will accept private clients due to risks involved.
Publication Name: Investors Chronicle
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0261-3115
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Auditor quality, signalling, and the valuation of initial public offerings. The opening, short, medium and long term performance of Canadian unit trust initial public offerings (IPOs)
- Abstracts: Over the rainbow. A city tradition that survives. Be prepared
- Abstracts: Ibstock: another brick in the wall. Titon: safe hands. Brick makers discover their feet of clay
- Abstracts: Do interviewers follow telephone survey instructions? Estimating the worth of product characteristics. Virtual reality techniques in NPD research
- Abstracts: Taking stock in London. The puzzle of political risk