Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: what you see is what you do
Article Abstract:
Managers who intend to abandon a market position are required to search for better alternatives, and have to decide if they should create a new market position or simply enter a current position. An argument posits that organizations rely on other organizations when abandoning their market position and is thus likely to embrace a position that already exists instead of inventing a new one. To test this assertion, a longitudinal study of new format adoptions by radio stations in the was conducted. Findings of this study demonstrated that radio stations that participate in a new format facilitate mimetic entry by other stations that can observe their actions. Therefore, the results find support for the aforementioned argument.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Order of entry and performance in new markets
Article Abstract:
The assertion that the first entrant into a market enjoys an enduring advantage over all later market entrants is tested. Behavior and performance of three entrant categories - pioneers, early followers, and late entrants - are compared. A set of hypotheses are developed from a population ecology model. These hypotheses are tested on samples of start-up and adolescent businesses. The results indicate that the different entrant categories tend to have significantly different strategic profiles and performance levels. On the average, market pioneers outperform later entrants.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1988
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Beyond the reach of the invisible hand: impediments to economic activity, market failures, and profitability
Article Abstract:
Failures of the competitive market are prerequisites for supranormal profitability. From the theory of competitive markets, three fundamental causes of market failures are developed: production economies and sunk costs, imperfect information, and transaction costs. These causes of market failures are discussed in terms of their profitability. Successful strategies for exploiting market failures can be determined by identifying these 'impediments to economic activity'.
Publication Name: Strategic Management Journal
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0143-2095
Year: 1988
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: The role of options in the resolution of agency problems: a comment. The role of options in the resolution of agency problems: a reply
- Abstracts: Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Using simulated mergers to evaluate corporate diversification strategies
- Abstracts: Critical factors affecting the planning and implementation of major projects. An application of metric conjoint analysis for the evaluation of top managers' individual strategic decision making processes: a research note
- Abstracts: Panglossian accounting theories: the science of apologizing in style. An analysis of the research contributions of Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1976-1984
- Abstracts: The greys: a market comes of age. First the pints, then the pubs