Safe and healthy in the office
Article Abstract:
Employers are responsible for health and safety in offices under the Offices, Shops and Railways Premises Act 1963 and the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. The former appliesto existing workplaces, while the latter for new workplaces. These laws providethe standards employers must maintain regarding cleanliness, overcrowding, temperature, ventilation, lighting, sanitary conveniences and washing facilities and other requirements such as the availability of drinking water. New provisions also require rest facilities for pregnant women and nursing mothers. Office safety is monitored by local authority health environmental officers who perform inspections and initiate prosecutions. In addition, s 2 ofthe Health and Safety Work Act 1974 specifies employers' statutory duties for the health, safety and welfare of their employees. Provisions for first aid andaccident reporting are also described.
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
How big is a pay packet?
Article Abstract:
Section 1(1) of UK's Wages Act of 1986 provides guidelines as to the legality of deductions from an employee's pay. According to this law, pay deductions can only be considered lawful if they are statutory payments, are specified in the written employment contract and made known to the employee previous to the deduction, or had the written consent of the employee. Some cases are exempted from this law, such as when deductions are made during industrial actions. During a total strike, it is lawful for employers not to pay striking employees and to end the employment contract. As for the matter of deducting from a payment in lieu of notice, the Court of Appeals and the House of Lords have classified such a payment as a non-contractual one. Since it it not in the same class as wages and salaries, which fall under the category of contractual payments, it should not be treated the same.
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Law case review
Article Abstract:
Two cases decided by the High Court and the Court of Appeal in 2001 are surveyed. Issues highlighted from the cases surveyed include duty of care, share valuation, the appointment of an accountant and circumvention of pre-emption rights.
Publication Name: Accountancy
Subject: Business
ISSN: 0001-4664
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Peace of mind that's cheap at the price. Giving investors a Pep talk
- Abstracts: Testing the medal. What makes an expert? Bill's excellent adventure
- Abstracts: Mexico Leverages Free Trade. Mexico Has the Gas, But Foreign Drillers are not Welcome. Trade Finance Solutions Grow With Trade
- Abstracts: Cool, calm and quintessentially English. Slipping off the core. Winning the war
- Abstracts: The world is not enough. The domino effect. It's good to talk