Does free exit reduce shirking in production teams?
Article Abstract:
Justin Lin's 1990 hypothesis, attributing the demise of Chinese agriculture in 1959-61 to the elimination of exit rights on farm collectives, does not hold true either theoretically or empirically. Theoretically, exit costs, more than exit rights, support cooperation and productivity. Empirically, state policy errors more clearly produced the stagnant agricultural period. Some of the errors included limited labor movement out of farming, barriers to interregional specialization, disadvantageous price policies, political intervention in management, and ineffective material incentives.
Publication Name: Journal of Comparative Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0147-5967
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Exit rights, retaliatory shirking, and the agricultural crisis in China
Article Abstract:
Lin's 1990 hypothesis oversimplified China's agriculture crisis of 1959-61. The deprivation of exit rights may have caused a decline in productivity, although Lin's estimates are inconclusive on this count, but the rights revocation clearly was not responsible for starvation and famine. The collapse of production incentives in rural areas, due in part to the state's reallocation of farm resources, precipitated the crisis. Future study on Chinese collectivism could be improved with the classification of workers into four distinct types.
Publication Name: Journal of Comparative Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0147-5967
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Exit rights, exit costs, and shirking in agricultural cooperatives: a reply
Article Abstract:
Papers by Dong and Dow, and by Kung, incorrectly contradict the theory that productivity declined in Chinese agriculture from 1959 to 1961 because of the deprivation of exit rights. The Dong and Dow and Kung assertions are based on MacLeod's papers, but MacLeod based his research on the case where a worker has incentive to shirk and quit and Lin based his research on the case where a worker has incentive to shirk and stay. Incorrect assumptions are cited in the Dong and Dow study, and inconsistencies in the Kung paper are described.
Publication Name: Journal of Comparative Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0147-5967
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Commentaries on the M3-competition; an introduction, some comments and a scorecard. The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications
- Abstracts: Corporate governance: separation of powers and checks and balances in Israeli corporate law. The Israeli approach to advertising: ethical and legal norms
- Abstracts: Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: reply
- Abstracts: Morishima on Ricardo. Morishima on Ricardo: a rejoinder. Fund-flow versus flow-flow in production theory: reflections on Georgescu-Roegen's contribution
- Abstracts: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Profitability, investment and average returns. Industry costs of equity