Stock return variation and expected dividends: a time-series and cross- sectional analysis
Article Abstract:
Changes in expectations of future dividends, investments and future returns highly account for the variation in aggregate stock returns. A simple time- series model indicates that changes in dividend yield account for 72% of annualstock return variation. Industrial growth rates have also been found to exert marginal pressure on stock returns. A cross-sectional test of 20 portfolio stocks ranked according to their annual return performance show that nearly 90%of the variation in portfolio income is due to dividend and expected return variables.
Publication Name: Journal of Financial Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0304-405X
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Problems in measuring portfolio perrformance: an application to contrarian investment strategies
Article Abstract:
A study was conducted on performance measurement problems in raw and abnormal five-year buy-and-hold contrarian portfolio returns. The problems were examined in the context of a DeBondt and Thaler contrarian research design. Results showed that mean-variance-based abnormal contrarian returns have a tendency to be biased upward. An observed beta behavior in up and down markets was found to be followed by a large negative alpha. Lastly, loser-stock return distribution was found to be highly right-skewed.
Publication Name: Journal of Financial Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0304-405X
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Book-to-market, dividend yield, and expected market returns: a time-series analysis
Article Abstract:
The predictability of stock returns is supported by reliable evidence obtained from studies pointing that book-to-market (B/M) and dividend yield track time-series variation in expected market index returns over the period 1926-91. Bayesian-bootstrap simulation was used to prove the point. B/M results of the study suggests that expected return variation over the 1926-91 period was not driven by equilibrium changes in compensation for risk.
Publication Name: Journal of Financial Economics
Subject: Economics
ISSN: 0304-405X
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Participation and productivity: a comparison of worker cooperatives and conventional firms in the plywood industry
- Abstracts: Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: comment. Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: reply
- Abstracts: Address by His Excellency President Soeharto of the Republic of Indonesia at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Rio de Janeiro, 12 June 1992
- Abstracts: Does corporate performance improve after mergers? The challenges of investor communication: the case of CUC International, Inc