function confirmModerate(url,num,pid){ url = url + '?Comments[do]=mod&Comments[pid]=' + pid + '&Comments[id]=' + num + '#Comments_' + num; if (confirm('Do you want to report this comment as inappropriate?')) location.href=url; return 0; } function validate_form(frm) { var value = ''; var errFlag = new Array(); _qfMsg = ''; value = frm.elements['Comments[name]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['name']) { errFlag['name'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your name'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[captcha]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['captcha']) { errFlag['captcha'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter Security Code'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[mail]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your e-mail'; } var regex = /^((\"[^\"\f\n\r\t\v\b]+\")|([\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+(\.[\w\!\#\$\%\&'\*\+\-\~\/\^\`\|\{\}]+)*))@((\[(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))\])|(((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9]))\.((25[0-5])|(2[0-4][0-9])|([0-1]?[0-9]?[0-9])))|((([A-Za-z0-9\-])+\.)+[A-Za-z\-]+))$/; if (value != '' &&!regex.test(value) && !errFlag['mail']) { errFlag['mail'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - E-mail address format is invalid'; } value = frm.elements['Comments[text]'].value; if (value == '' && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Please enter your comment'; } if (value.length<50 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too short (50 characters min.)'; } if (value.length>4000 && !errFlag['text']) { errFlag['text'] = true; _qfMsg = _qfMsg + '\n - Comment is too long (4000 characters max)'; } if (_qfMsg != '') { _qfMsg = 'Invalid information entered:' + _qfMsg + '\nPlease correct these fields.'; alert(_qfMsg); return false; } return true; } //]]>

Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women

Article Abstract:

Certain screening questionnaires for detecting alcohol use in women are more effective than others. Researchers analyzed 13 articles that evaluated several alcohol screening questionnaires, including CAGE, TWEAK, T-ACE and AUDIT. CAGE was effective in screening black women, but not white women, especially at traditional cutoff points. TWEAK and AUDIT were more effective for screening blacks and whites, especially for heavy alcohol use.

Author: Bradley, Katharine A. MD, MPH, Boyd-Wickizer, Jodie BA, Powell, Suzanne H., Burman, Marcia L. MD

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women

Article Abstract:

Certain screening questionnaires for detecting alcohol use in women are more effective than others. Researchers analyzed 13 articles that evaluated several alcohol screening questionnaires, including CAGE, TWEAK, T-ACE and AUDIT. CAGE was effective in screening black women, but not white women, especially at traditional cutoff points. TWEAK and AUDIT were more effective for screening blacks and whites, especially for heavy alcohol use.

Author: Bradley, Katharine A. MD, MPH, Boyd-Wickizer, Jodie BA, Burman, Marcia L. MD, Powell, Suzanne

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women

Article Abstract:

Certain screening questionnaires for detecting alcohol use in women are more effective than others. Researchers analyzed 13 articles that evaluated several alcohol screening questionnaires, including CAGE, TWEAK, T-ACE and AUDIT. CAGE was effective in screening black women, but not white women, especially at traditional cutoff points. TWEAK and AUDIT were more effective for screening blacks and whites, especially for heavy alcohol use.

Author: Bradley, Katharine A. MD, MPH, Boyd-Wickizer, Jodie BA, Burman, Marcia L. MD, Powell, Suzanne

Publisher: American Medical Association
Publication Name: JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0098-7484
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Subjects list: Evaluation, Testing, Women, Drinking of alcoholic beverages, Drinking (Alcoholic beverages), Medical screening, Health screening, Alcohol use

Similar abstracts:

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.