Health warnings, smoking, and cancer - the Cipollone case
Article Abstract:
The only plaintiffs in product-liability lawsuits against tobacco companies who have been awarded damages are the family of Rose Cipollone in Cipollone v. Liggett Group. Rose Cipollone started smoking cigarettes in 1942. After developing lung cancer in 1982, she and her husband Antonio filed a lawsuit against several tobacco companies for damages. A jury awarded Antonio $400,000 in damages in 1988 despite the ruling that Rose Cipollone was 80% at fault for her illness. The jury based the award on the fact that the Liggett Group failed its obligation to warn against the health hazards of smoking before 1966. After 1966, tobacco companies were required by federal law to warn consumers about the health hazards of smoking. The jury's decision was reversed by an appeals court, and the case went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided that individuals with smoking-associated illnesses can sue tobacco companies despite the warnings on cigarette packages.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Cowboys, camels, and the First Amendment - the FDA's restrictions on tobacco advertising
Article Abstract:
The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) proposal to restrict tobacco advertising is open to challenge as a violation of first amendment rights. The intent is to reduce the number of teenage smokers, a laudable goal. However, based on previous case law, the courts could demand that given the drastic nature of the restrictions, the FDA must demonstrate that no other strategy would work as well. The FDA argues it need only demonstrate that advertising affects tobacco use among youths. Whatever the outcome, restrictions on advertising are likely to lead to years of litigation.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Tobacco, the Food and Drug Administration, and Congress
Article Abstract:
Two lawyers believe a new federal agency should be created to regulate tobacco products. In 2000, the US Supreme Court ruled that Congress had not given the FDA jurisdiction to regulate tobacco products.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Efficacy and safety of the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir in the treatment of influenzavirus infections. Inhaled zanamivir for the prevention of influenza in families
- Abstracts: Relation between damage to the placenta and the fetal brain after late-gestation placental embolization and fetal growth restriction in sheep
- Abstracts: Hormone Replacement Therapy, Prothrombotic Mutations, and the Risk of Incident Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction in Postmenopausal Women
- Abstracts: Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and caldesmon expression in the anterior vaginal wall of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse
- Abstracts: Human chorionic gonadotropin directly and indirectly alters uterine arteriolar diameters in cycling rats. Pregnancy-induced alterations of uterine arteriolar reactivity in the rat: observations with a new in vivo microcirculatory preparation