Is a tick's bark worse that its bite? Formulating an answer with decision analysis
Article Abstract:
Decision analysis can be used successfully to evaluate the need to treat patients for Lyme disease who have been bitten by a tick. Inference or intuition does not give consistent decisions and cannot incorporate all the factors to be considered before starting treatment. Decision analysis can help determine the statistics and other information physicians need from epidemiologists to make more accurate treatment decisions. Physicians must know if the tick is the ixodes dammini species, the species which can carry the Lyme disease spirochete, and also know if the ixodes ticks in their area carry the spirochete. If the area is endemic for the disease, as in the East Coast, antibiotics should be prescribed without evaluation of the probability that the tick is of the ixodes species or if it carries the spirochete.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Federal foolishness and marijuana
Article Abstract:
Federal government officials should not dictate policy regarding medical use of marijuana. They put bureaucratic ideology in conflict with compassion. If physicians can prescribe narcotics, which have far graver potential adverse effects, then prescribing marijuana should be left to their discretion. Research to "prove" efficacy is unnecessary. A drug as safe as marijuana requires only that seriously ill patients experience symptom relief. The public through state legislation has given physicians the freedom to prescribe. Marijuana should be reclassified as a Schedule 2 drug, that is, a drug that is potentially addictive but has medical use.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Managing managed care's tarnished image
Article Abstract:
The Putting Patients First plan proposed by the American Association of Health Plans (AAHP) appears to be an attempt to forestall efforts to regulate managed care plans. AAHP is the primary organization representing managed care plans and has over 1,000 members. Managed care plans have come under fire and about 1,000 bills to regulate them have been introduced in state legislatures and Congress. Putting Patients First includes recommendations for improving patient care, but none has the force of a requirement and there is no evidence that AAHP plans to measure compliance with the plan.
Publication Name: The New England Journal of Medicine
Subject: Health
ISSN: 0028-4793
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Isoniazid as preventive therapy in HIV-infected intravenous drug abusers: a decision analysis. Tuberculosis outbreak among HIV-infected persons
- Abstracts: Measuring and knowing: the trouble with cholesterol and decision making
- Abstracts: Foot care program for patients with leprosy also may prevent amputations in persons with diabetes. Last USPHS leprosy hospital phasing out: research relocating to university
- Abstracts: Update: barrier protection against HIV infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Spermicides, HIV, and the vaginal sponge
- Abstracts: A 29-month-old girl with worsening ataxia, nystagmus, and subsequent opsoclonus and myoclonus. Progressive neurodegenerative disease in a young boy