Revisiting multi-tier wage structures: equity, employment mobility, and tier effects
Article Abstract:
This study considers the competing conclusions reached by Martin and Peterson (1987) and Cappelli and Sherer (1990) regarding two-tier wage systems and examines how worker perceptions of their own employment mobility affect attitudes about two-tier systems. Findings from a hybrid multi-tier wage system in the retail food industry containing both permanent and merging or temporary tiers indicates that workers on the permanently lower B tier possessed more negative attitudes than their A-tier counterparts, with some evidence that the effects of permanent and temporary plans differ. Employment mobility moderates these attitudes, for low mobility workers report more positive attitudes than do high mobility workers. (Reprinted with permission by author.)
Publication Name: Journal of Labor Research
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0195-3613
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Mandated benefits and entry-level employees and employment
Article Abstract:
Entry-level employees, particularly those with little education and skill, are often not provided fringe benefits that are included in the compensation packages of their more skilled and experienced counterparts. Under the rubric of improving the well-being of entry-level employees, Congres is considering proposals requiring employers provide specific benefits to employees. Unfortunately, by substituting political directives for market decision making, mandated benefits impose economic inefficiencies, and most of the resulting costs are borne by the entry-level employees purportedly most helped by mandated benefits. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Labor Research
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0195-3613
Year: 1993
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Why is flexible employment increasing?
Article Abstract:
Firms have increased their reliance on flexible, or temporary, employment. Some of this increase is a normal market response to technological and demographic trends largely beyond the control of public policy. But the trend toward flexible employment is also explained by increased government regulation of labor markets. This regulation has increased the cost of employing permanent workers relative to the cost of employing temporary workers. Of primary importance has been the substitution of regulatory restrictions on hiring and firing for the common law doctrine of employment at will. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Publication Name: Journal of Labor Research
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0195-3613
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Downsizing and other related workforce trends: an employee benefits perspective. Will employee choice and defined contribution health plans salvage the embattled managed care system?
- Abstracts: Mixed signals breed mistrust. Why employees stay is more critical than why they leave
- Abstracts: Hispanics: when has equal employment been achieved? Put diversity in context
- Abstracts: Dual labor markets, efficiencey wages, and search. Unemployment Compensation Finance and Efficiency Wages. The Effects of Rising Female Labor Supply on Male Wages
- Abstracts: Trade union membership in Britain, 1980-1987: unemployment and restructuring