Section 89: close the new Pandora's box
Article Abstract:
The Tax Reform Act of 1986, through Section 89 of the Internal Revenue Code, states that health and welfare benefit plans cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees (HCEs). There are special rules for defining excludable employees, compensation, HCEs, and employees. Each optional benefit plan is treated as separate for testing purposes. All plans must satisfy two general requirements: at least 80% of a company's non-HCEs must be covered under the plan. Otherwise, the plan must pass the 90%-50% eligibility test, the 50% eligibility test, and the 75% average benefit test. Employees can help by learning about Section 89, identifying the data required for testing, developing in-house expertise to perform the test, and developing a plan to implement any needed changes.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1988
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Equal opportunity: an incomplete evolution
Article Abstract:
Some employers blame increasing employee turnover rates among women and minority group members on affirmative action programs; these managers claim that higher salaries are offered to women and minority group members in order to attract them away from their current employers. Whereas this may be true in isolated cases, the real reason for increased turnover among women and minority employees is the continuing discriminatory attitudes of coworkers and supervisors, despite equal employment legislation. Employee and supervisor training programs need to address discriminatory attitudes in order to prevent high turnover levels. Training programs with affirmative action goals and equal employment opportunity objectives are discussed.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1986
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Gay rights and workplace discrimination
Article Abstract:
Federal courts before 1987 generally rejected job discrimination claims based on the sexual orientation of the claimant. Both the courts and the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission had ruled that employment actions taken against people because of their sexual orientation did not constitute discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Homosexuals still do not have anti-discrimination protection in private employment, but recent court cases suggest that such protection in public sector employment will soon be granted. Private sector personnel managers should begin to prepare the appropriate procedures and policies before these issues are litigated.
Publication Name: Personnel Journal
Subject: Human resources and labor relations
ISSN: 0031-5745
Year: 1988
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: More councils adopt CRE standard. EU race discrimination directive. Public sector race amendment
- Abstracts: The composition of public sector compensation: the effects of unionization and bureaucratic size. The Effect of Unionization on Safety in Bituminous Deep Mines
- Abstracts: How to determine future workforce needs. Fast and easy reference checking by telephone
- Abstracts: New AIDS developments. The workplace and AIDS: a guide to service and information. Eight characteristics of organizational effectiveness
- Abstracts: Succession systems in large corporations: characteristics and correlates of performance. Matching managers to strategies: point and counterpoint