A 'Markman' hearing can determine case outcome; it is prudent to have a litigator experienced in drafting claims and getting them through PTO
Article Abstract:
Markman hearings take place before a judge or patent law expert, and the skills necessary to prepare and present a case at such a hearing are significantly different from trial skills. Accordingly, the patent litigator selected should have experience drafting claims and getting these claims through the Patent Office, and also in advocating claims, such as before the Patent Office Board of Appeals. Markman hearings are as important as jury trials and the client should be advised of their critical nature.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
'Sage' advice: set it out clearly in public record; an inventor must now describe unambiguously in an application the claim's meaning and scope
Article Abstract:
The author claims that United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rulings such as Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc. and Bell & Howell Document Management Products Co. v. Altek Systems show that the ability of patent applicants and their attorneys to assert their patent claims will depend on the public record made in the claims and specification, while infringement litigation will be much less important.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Patent law; obviousness findings
Article Abstract:
Issues concerning the definition of obviousness in patent law are discussed The definition of obviousness in statute and precedent is fact-intensive, and the courts and the Patent and Trademark Office determine whether an invention would have been obvious to a hypothetical person with ordinary skill in the art at a given time.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: A warning on a product may not bar liability, two courts hold in decisions citing the new Restatement. Guilt by association(s)? Injured plaintiffs sue groups that promote faulty products and standards
- Abstracts: A U.C.C. for e-commerce angers some; uniform law group also has plan for evidence, estate tax. New suits pre-empt HMO move by House; lawyers build on the growing body of patients' rights law
- Abstracts: FCC gains upper hand over local telephone companies; a recent high court decision and an FCC order on ISPs uphold the FCC's regulatory primacy over local telecommunications
- Abstracts: 'Love contracts.' Can EEOC go to court? The Supreme Court is considering whether the commission is bound by an arbitration agreement entered into by an employee
- Abstracts: Market volatility will affect merger negotiations. Insurance is available for pharmaceutical recalls; CGL and all-risk policies should together cover third-party liabilities and first-party costs