A company's ability to prevent disclosure of attorney's notes created during an internal investigation may depend on its use of reports produced in the inquiry
Article Abstract:
Several federal courts have ruled on the confidentiality of attorney memoranda created during investigation of possible corporate irregularities. The judges agreed that attorney-client confidentiality covered attorney interviews with corporation personnel, but disagreed on whether interviews with third parties came under the work-product doctrine and whether the confidentiality privilege was waived by publication of a report of the investigative results. Cases discussed include In re Woolworth Securities Class Action Litigation, In re Kidder Peabody Securities Litigation, Harding v. Dana Transport , Inc. and In re Leslie Fay Cos. Securities Litigation.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The NASD's proposed changes to its arbitration procedures would affect rules on eligibility, punitive damages, discovery and the selection of arbitrators
Article Abstract:
The Natl Assn of Securities Dealers' Arbitration Policy Task Force recently completed its 156-page report, including a series of practical, far-reaching recommendations. Critical, though subtle, is its suggestion that the parties appoint arbitrators through a list-selection method within 45 days after issue is joined. Other important proposals are early and automatic document production, tripling the limit for simplified arbitration to $30,000, and mandatory early neutral evaluation.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The 2d Circuit recently dismissed a lawsuit seeking an arbitration stay and let NASD arbitrators determine punitive damages, attorney fees and limitations
Article Abstract:
Various federal court holdings show a standard New York choice-of-law provision in an arbitration agreement cannot be assumed to mean the courts will enforce state rules limiting arbitrators' authority. For parties wishing the help of such rules, their contract should state that in spite of the arbitrability of all disputes, statute-of-limitations matters will be determined by the courts, and punitive damages and legal fees cannot be awarded at all. Various cases are discussed.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Patentability issues relating to interference counts. U.S. GATT legislation changes patent term. Should the clear & convincing evidence standard for rebutting the presumption of validity apply when the challenger raises a substantial new question of patentability?
- Abstracts: A critical assessment of intracorporate loss shifting after prosecutions based on corporate wrongdoing. Beyond Aronson: recent Delaware cases on demand futility
- Abstracts: Checklist for internal investigations - practical pointers to remember during an internal investigation. Between a rock and a hard place: internal corporate investigations and the attorney-client privilege
- Abstracts: Implications of the Superleague case. Securing the rights of minority shareholders: the courts can do it without the need for statutory change
- Abstracts: Lack of formality takes its toll in company decisions. Regulators may arrange to use the private sector but great care must be taken in doing so