Adding an economic reactionary to the Supreme Court: high costs of the Ginsburg nomination

Article Abstract:

The nomination of D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg is an error on the part of the Clinton administration because her views on antitrust and business issues are inconsistent with the economic values that Pres. Clinton has set forth. The only time she voted for an antitrust plaintiff was when a merger would result in one firm controlling 100% of the market. Pres. Clinton's support of small business and international competitiveness will not be well served by the nomination of US Supreme Court Justices that believe in the efficiency of big business.

Appointments, resignations and dismissals, United States. Supreme Court, Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (American Supreme Court justice)

---

Corporate 'bloat' and U.S. competitiveness: 'monopoly is the great enemy of good management.'

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court is operating under the mistaken assumption that profitability and competitiveness are synonymous, and the perpetuation of inefficient large corporations is harming the ability of the US to compete on an international level. Policymakers have focused on the productivity problems of US labor without considering the efficiency problems of US industrial organization. The US Department of Labor needs to continue to take an aggressive stance against the anticompetitive behavior of industries such as the airlines and the automakers.

Economic aspects, Monopolistic competition, United States. Department of Labor

---

Accomplices in U.S. judicial corruption: costliest legacy of the Clinton presidency

Article Abstract:

A critique of Pres Bill Clinton's handling of antitrust policy is presented. Clinton has failed to appoint people to antitrust enforcement position who support antitrust and judges have not been educated as to antitrust policy.

United States, Judicial process

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: A second generation of sexual harassment law: the Supreme Court rewrites the rules for the workplace. The thin line between love and hate: same sex hostile environment sexual harassment
• Abstracts: Proving ADA discrimination: the Courts' view. Proving Title VII religious discrimination. Proving Title VII sexual harassment: the courts' view
• Abstracts: The waiting at the (patent) bar is over - the Supreme Court decides Hilton Davis. Do the means justify the end - a matter of Bond, Bowles, the office and 35 U.S.C. s. 112, paragraph 6
• Abstracts: Predatory pricing conspiracy too 'economically irrational' to require a trial: the Matsushita decision
• Abstracts: The politics of antitrust: President Clinton's bridge to the 21st century's new robber barons. An antitrust agenda for President Clinton: demote 'theory' and restore the private cases

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.