Aids can convince jurors by appealing to senses; studies show that jurors retain facts longer when presented in more than one sensory modality
Article Abstract:
Evidence engaging multiple senses or modes of apprehension creates better understanding and remains longer in a juror's memory, especially evidence presented with spoken and written language as well as pictures. There are many ways to present such evidence, with the choice depending on resources, time, the case's size and complexity, and potential risks. In a complex case the attorneys should break the overall case into segments, each focused on a particular element susceptible to relatively simple analysis.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Technology shouldn't mothball the 'motherboard;' when creating visual exhibits, a low-tech alternative often can be cheaper and more effective
Article Abstract:
Magnetic boards and similar low-tech but professional forms of presenting information are usually less expensive than their hig-tech equivalents and are often more effective as well. Slick presentations relying on electronics can put a jury off, identifying the presenting attorney with the moneyed party rather than the underdog. Simpler methods make the lawyer the center of attention, giving more control over the pace of the information flow. Finally, low-tech methods may better engage the critical mind.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
What computes in court; technologically sophisticated court exhibits can raise some interesting evidentiary issues
Article Abstract:
Computers and evidence produced from or stored on them are valid tools for court, though their status as evidence or educational material determines what rules govern. At root, computer-generated evidence is akin to models or photographic evidence, though the potential for subtle modification demands caution. Questions regarding authentication, cross-examination, requirements for expert analysis, and the Federal Rules of Evidence are examined. Early planning is essential to the proper use of such tools.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Affirmative action on way out in California: law school student bodies will be primarily white and Asian, some say
- Abstracts: Much of the transactional activity following the Telecommunications Act of 1996 flows from the elimination of entry barriers and outmoded regulations
- Abstracts: 'Free exercise' revisited. Prosecutors tread where defenders daren't go. Clinton v. Starr v. Clinton may make court act