Antitrust and intellectual property: from separate spheres to unified field
Article Abstract:
The modern approach to the interaction between the legal monopolies created by intellectual property law and antitrust regulation is exemplified in the Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. The guidelines were issued in 1995 jointly by the FTC and The US Dept of Justice and are a result of a movement away from the view that intellectual property and antitrust regulation are antithetical. Recognition that restraints on licensing and other methods may unfairly increase market power of intellectual property holders and licensees has led to the new approach.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Running the gauntlet: antitrust and intellectual property pitfalls on the two sides of the Atlantic
Article Abstract:
The application of EC and US antitrust law to intellectual property rights and licensing agreements has been converging, but there are still some antitrust doctrines that pose risks for the technology sector. The increased importance of intellectual property has resulted in relaxation of some standards, but in the US, misuse actions are still available to private litigants and the innovation market concept poses dangers for the nonuse of technology. EC authorities have demonstrated a willingness to impose a duty to license on intellectual property rights holders.
Publication Name: Antitrust Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0003-6056
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Enforcers focus on IP issues: standard setting in high-tech industries draws scrutiny when IP rights exclude competitors
Article Abstract:
Industry standard-setting poses interpretive challenges for the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department in their enforcement of antitrust laws. Such standards, nominally promoted in many high tech industries to improve compatibility, may have the effect of excluding competitors particularly when the standard inventor decides to enforce patent rights. A rule-of-reason approach is used that assesses whether the standard is valuable enough to overcome potential anti-competitive effects.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Intellectual property escrow agreements in international joint ventures. Entertainment on the Internet: First Amendment and copyright issues
- Abstracts: Rapists under 14 in the news. Litigation as a strategy in penal reform. The reporting trajectories of top homicide cases in the media: a case study of The Times
- Abstracts: Election campaign propaganda: Board policy then and now. Arbitrating employee intellectual property disputes. Weingarten through the looking glass
- Abstracts: The forgotten victims: new ABA domestic violence program reaches out to children. Florida bar's ad restriction constitutional: High Court upholds 30-day ban on lawyer mail solicitation of accident victims
- Abstracts: Manual and non-manual workers - basic rates and hours. Manual workers - basic rates and hours of work