Antitrust counterclaims in patent infringement litigation: clarifying the Supreme Court's enigmatic Mercoid decision
Article Abstract:
The author explains the Supreme Court's 1944 holding in Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co., the origin of the controversial use of antitrust counterclaims in patent infringement litigation.The conclusion is that such counterclaims in patent infringement litigation fall into the permissive category under Rule 13(b) and thus may be tried separately if strategically feasible.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
What it means to "entirely vitiate" a claim element in light of Warner-Jenkinson
Article Abstract:
Issues are discussed regarding the implementation of the Federal Circuit's Warner-Jenkinson holding rejecting a theory of equivalents entirely vitiating a claim limitation. When faced with a claim of infringement by equivalents, patent defendants should use the language of the claims and the intrinsic record to determine the appropriateness of the theory of equivalents.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Protecting patents from the beginning: the importance of information disclosure statements during patent prosecution
Article Abstract:
The importance of filing comprehensive information disclosure statements (IDS) to ensure the validity and enforcability of a US patent and during patent prosecution is discussed. The appropriate format to be used, the timeliness of submission and what an IDS must disclose are outlined. The consequences of intentional and unintentional non-disclosure are also discussed.
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: IRS invites comments on clarifying the effect of INDOPCO on current deductibility. IRS rules that severence pay remains currently deductible after INDOPCO
- Abstracts: Remarks by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. Dedication to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
- Abstracts: More accounting method changes granted automatic consent. Prop. regs. clarify reporting payments to attorneys
- Abstracts: International arbitration agreements: a look behind the scenes. International arbitration agreements in United States courts
- Abstracts: Pill splitting raises issues of safety and patent coverage; cases upholding single-use limitations might prevent dividing doses, either by commercial outfits or by individuals