Bankruptcy; new-value exception
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court ruled in Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership that a new-value plan of bankruptcy reorganization granting prebankruptcy equity holders the exclusive right to receive ownership interests in the reorganized debtor in return for a contribution of new capital without any valuation of the adequacy of the proposed contribution was not approved. Inconsistency among the circuits on the viability of the new-value exception will continue without a legislative fix.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Lessors win bankruptcy claim status; the 2d Circuit recently awarded landlords a priority for claims against Chapter 11 debtors, allowing losses to be paid in full
Article Abstract:
The US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit rendered a judgment favorable to landlords of commercial real property in its 1996 reversal of a lower court's decision in Nostas Assocs v Costich (In re Klein Sleep Prods). The case concerned the priority accorded landlords' claims in bankruptcy when the debtor rejected a lease it had previously assumed while in bankruptcy. The Court ruled that such claims are administrative, not unsecured, as the lessor has already derived the benefit of assuming a longer lease.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
The 2d Circuuit sides with the 4th Circuit by limiting the right of old-equity participants to preserve their interests under the 'new-value exception.'
Article Abstract:
The United States Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit ruled in In re Coltex Loop Central Three Partners against a plan of bankruptcy reorganization allowing old-equity participants to preserve their positions in return for a contribution of new capital to fund a plan. The court held that old equity may preserve its interest only if it has evidence that no other party tried to file a competing plan or that the value of the interest to be retained was adequately priced.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Majority's decision criticized in forceful dissent; Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman attacks 'Markman' for limiting the right to a jury trial
- Abstracts: The good faith fable of 11 U.S.C. s. 707(a): how bankruptcy courts have invented a good faith filing requirement for Chapter 7 debtors
- Abstracts: Federal practice; complex litigation. Complex litigation; the art of interviewing
- Abstracts: Antimonopoly push from 20 U.S. states: 2nd prong of the government's case against Microsoft. Predation 'strategy' of American Airlines: a change of heart at the Justice Department?
- Abstracts: 'Miranda' upheaval unlikely; DAs don't favor recent 4th Cir. limit, which does not affect typical case. Trial nears for untested secrets law; some experts see trouble for Economic Espionage Act