Case law: A. Court of Justice: Case C-320/03, Commission v. Republic of Austria, judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 November 2005, nyr
Article Abstract:
The ban under scrutiny on the use of part of an Austrian motorway through the Alps for certain heavy goods vehicles is the subject of the case C-320/03 of Commission V. Republic of Austria. The ruling in this case by Grad Chamber Court on 15 November 2005 declares the ban inadmissible, for breach of the proportionality principle, simply stating that free movement may be justified for environmental reasons, as long as they are proportionate, without addressing the issue of discrimination.
Publication Name: Common Market Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0165-0750
Year: 2006
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Case law: Case C-174/04, Commission v. Italian Republic, judgment of the Court of Justice (First Chamber) of 2 June 2005
Article Abstract:
The judgment of the Court of Justice on 2 June 2005, in the case C-174/04 of Commission V. Italian Republic held that the Italian law was in breach of Article 56 EC on the prohibition to restrict the movement of capitals between Member States and between Member Sates and third countries. In the judgment, the Court seized the opportunity to further refine the scope of application of Article 56 EC, having regard especially to the nomenclature annexed to Directive 88/361/EC.
Publication Name: Common Market Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0165-0750
Year: 2006
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Case C-94/03, Commission v. Council, judgment of the Second Chamber of 10, January 2006[2006] ECR I-1; Case C-178/03, Commission v. Parliament and council, judgment of the Second Chamber of 10 January 2006, [2006] ECRI-107
Article Abstract:
The article discusses about the case C-178/03, in which, the Commission challenged adoption of Regulation 304/2003 by Council and Parliament. In both the cases the court ruled that recourse to Article 133 and 175(1) EC was required since the Regulation had commercial and environmental components which are inseparably linked.
Publication Name: Common Market Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0165-0750
Year: 2007
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Case C-17/03, VEMW, APX en Eneco N.v. v. DTE, Judgment of the Full Court of 7 June 2005, nyr. Institutions and long term planning: lessons from the California electricity crisis
- Abstracts: National Courts. Case C-386/04, Centro di Musicologia Walter Stauffer v. Finanzamt Munchen fur Korperschaften
- Abstracts: The legal position of employees' in cross-border transfers of undertakings in the EU: A question of jurisdiction and choice of law
- Abstracts: Developments in EC competition law in 2005: An overview. Rough justice? An analysis of the European Commission's new finding guidelines