Constitutional law - peremptory challenges - Third Circuit holds that peremptory challenges based on foreign language ability do not violate the Equal Protection Clause
Article Abstract:
The Third Circuit overlooked the connection between language and ethnicity in ruling in Pemberthy v. Beyer that peremptory challenges based on foreign language ability do not infringe upon the Equal Protection Clause. Such language-based peremptory challenges should receive strict scrutiny because of the potential for discrimination against language minorities. Furthermore, less restrictive methods could have been employed to meet the state's compelling interest in a fair and impartial jury. Spanish-speaking jurors were struck in a case in which the evidence involved translation of telephone conversations from Spanish to English.
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Constitutional law - equal protection - Seventh Circuit denies a criminal defendant's objection to his counsel's race-based peremptory challenge
Article Abstract:
The Fifth Circuit's decision in 'United States v. Boyd' undermines the Supreme Court's guidelines on racially discriminatory peremptory challenges, set out in 'Batson v. Kentucky' and 'Georgia v. McCollum.' In 'Boyd,' the court decided than a defendant may only challenge his own attorney's discriminatory peremptory challenge by showing it amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. Instead, the court should have established a 'presumed prejudice' standard to comport with the 'Strickland' requirements.
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1997
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Beyond Batson: eliminating gender-based peremptory challenges
Article Abstract:
The analysis in Batson v Kentucky, which prohibited peremptory challenges based on race, should be extended to also prohibit gender-based peremptories. Although in other respects their experiences of discrimination have been distinct, both blacks and women have historically been excluded from jury service as part of a more general denial of full citizenship rights. Peremptories based on gender, as well as race, violate the excluded jurors' rights to equal protection.
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Constitutional law - First Amendment - Fourth Circuit rules that a teacher's selection of school curriculum is not protected speech
- Abstracts: Old laws shape kidnap case; spousal immunity at issue. And now, the power of tape; videos are being used to argue the case and not just demonstrate the 'facts.'
- Abstracts: Supreme Court holds legal and investment banking fees of target of friendly takeover nondeductible. Spin-off of newly formed subsidiary results in recapture of ITC
- Abstracts: Circuits split on color trademarks; the courts' inability to settle this issue makes litigants see red. Global colorblindness to trademarks is dying: the laws of the world are all over the spectrum, but the prospects for colors as marks are brighter
- Abstracts: IRS proposes increased availability of nondiscrimination safe harbors. DOL provides reporting requirement relief for "top hat" plans