Defining "otherwise qualified applicants": applying an antitrust relevant-market analysis to disparate impact cases
Article Abstract:
The author argues that commodity market antitrust principles can be applied to qualified labor markets to increase predictability of the applicant pool and the development of a coherent economic and legal framework for disparate impact cases.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Physical ability tests and Title VII
Article Abstract:
The author examines the Civil Rights Act of 1991's 'business necessity' or 'job related' defense for disparate impact claims under the Civil Rights Act of 1964's Title VII, with a focus on physical ability tests.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Defining the "essence of the business": an analysis of Title VII's privacy BFOQ after Johnson Controls
Article Abstract:
The author examines the 'bona fide occupational qualification', which allows employers to exclude job applicants because of their sex, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2000
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Selected developments concerning the federal securities laws and in the market for corporate control. Recent developments in securities class actions
- Abstracts: Maximizing the benefits of deducting an estate's debts and expenses
- Abstracts: A general model for corporate acquisition law. The unfairness of applying lack of marketability discounts to determine fair value in dissenters' rights cases
- Abstracts: Alienation; is there a legal solution to the immigration mess? Down on the body farm
- Abstracts: The concept of secondary liability: a conflict between car rental agencies and personal lines insurers. Insurance coverage for "inducement claims"