District court judges, exploring their role as 'gatekeepers' of scientific testimony, discover there are no simple formulas
Article Abstract:
The US Supreme Court's decision in Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals in 1993 increases trial courts' responsibility and discretion in determining the admissibility of scientific evidence. The high court ruled that based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702, courts should apply a two-prong test to novel scientific evidence. First they must decide whether the testimony pertains to scientific knowledge, then whether it will help the jury. Courts have not found it easy to apply this test, but it creates a hurdle for plaintiffs.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1995
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Should products liability cases be permitted to proceed as class actions? Many courts have said no, refusing to certify the class
Article Abstract:
Recent products liability decisions suggest that the courts are unwilling to let such cases proceed as class actions in the absence of specific evidence showing that the rules for class certification have been followed. A case which involves various state laws is unlikely to be certified as a class. The US Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit decertified In re American Medical Systems, Inc. as a class, ruling that there was no factual support for class certification.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
While most courts do not hold bulk suppliers of component parts liable for their customers' use, analyses vary significantly
Article Abstract:
The courts have different reasons for maintaining that bulk suppliers of component parts are not liable for their customers' use. The best situation to make the finished product reasonably safe and to provide warnings and instructions which work is held by the manufacturer of the finished product, not the bulk supplier. Case law and Section 5 of the Restatement(3d) of Torts: Products Liability acknowledge this fact.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Estate planning with respect to divorce. Estate planning specifically for the single parent. Planning strategies when a client's death is imminent
- Abstracts: Act against Spam: Bush signs anti-Spam legislation. E-discovery rules revisions nearing completion. New Congress convenes; approach to technology questioned
- Abstracts: The Euro-Mediterranean partnership: the role and impact of the economic and financial dimension
- Abstracts: Shopping the tip boutique: from fees to practice management, there are new ideas for everyone. Top bananas turn rainmakers: former corporate lawyers ripe for challenges in their own ventures
- Abstracts: Buying right the first time: for novice computer purchasers, here are some money-smart guidelines. New solutions from old software: save money, time by expanding the capabilities of existing applications